David I. Yoon, «Prominence and Markedness in New Testament Discourse.», Vol. 26 (2013) 3-26
Paul's testimony of his post-conversion experience in Galatians—the only place in the New Testament this is found—is the starting point for the rest of his polemic against his opponents who avert the gospel he first taught his readers. What is interesting is that he highlights or emphasizes certain portions of his testimony, using the linguistic method of prominence. As others have written already, prominence in Hellenistic Greek is conveyed in many ways, but one major way is by the writer's choice of verbal aspect. By first identifying a theory of prominence in the Greek of the New Testament, the paper then applies that theory to Gal 1:11–2:10 to discover that Paul emphasizes preaching and gospel related items in his testimony.
14 David I. Yoon
have a middle form but appear to have an active meaning. Again, this
is not the place for a detailed linguistic study on this issue, but it seems
agreeable that given the definition of the middle as internal causality,
or agent involvement, deponent verbs should be considered to have the
full force of the middle voice55. Pennington explains: “The Greek verbal
system has a rich and nuanced middle voice capable of communicating
any number of actions, attitudes and conditions involving a subject-
focused lexical idea” (italics mine)56. But while the “deponent” verb may
have the full force of the middle voice in its function, it may not convey
the full force of prominence that middle voice-forms have, due to its lack
of alternative active and passive voice-forms57. In other words, since the
speaker/writer does not have any other voice-form to choose from of the
so-called deponent verbs, the middle voice-form may not convey any more
prominence than the active voice.
4) Other Markers of Prominence. Westfall notes a number of other
potential categories of prominence: case; person and number; word order;
conjunctions and particles; markers of attention; temporal, spatial and
conceptual deixis; interrogatives; contrast and comparison; semantic
emphasis; elaboration and comment; concentration of participants;
summaries, conclusions, and central sentences; choice of lexis and
representation; patterns and repetition58. While it may seem that any
element in a linguistic system may potentially be prominent—one may
state every element in a given clause or discourse to be prominent, in
which case, then, none of the elements are prominent—what I have
identified are a few categories in which prominence may be determined,
and these namely related to the Greek verb.
B. Levels of Prominence
Corresponding to the three aspects in the Greek verbal system, there are
three levels of prominence, or grounding, in determining prominence59.
They are: a) background, b) foreground, and c) frontground60. Background
55
I think Pennington sufficiently explains how deponent verbs arose, and why we should
“set them aside.” Cf. Pennington, “Setting Aside ‘Deponency’,” 181–203.
56
Pennington, “Setting Aside ‘Deponency’,” 190.
57
Cf. Westfall, “Analysis of Prominence,” 81.
58
Westfall, “Analysis of Prominence,” 79–94.
59
Porter, Verbal Aspect, 92–93.
60
Porter, “Prominence,” 53. Reed (Philippians, 105–10) utilizes the terms background,
theme, and focus respectively, but I prefer the uniformity of Porter’s terms here. See next
paragraph for my explanation on this.