Josep Rius-Camp and Jenny Read-Heimerdinger 156 has the strong reflexive, except that there the verb on which the pronoun depends varies according to the text followed. A truer comparison can be made with Lk. 15:17 where the reflexive pronoun is read by both texts (ε αυτ ν δ λθ ν). τι B P74 ) A H L P 049. 056. 33 M ‖ τι λ. D d E Ψ 913. (ο δα) ληθ 1108. 1611. 2138 e p r aeth; Lcf Chr. The word order gives a somewhat different sense to the comment. The context is that Peter was not sure if what was happening to him through the angel was true (cf. 12:9a). Now, according to B03, he becomes sure, ‘I know truly’, as if before he thought he must have been dreaming. D05 puts it differently: he now realizes that God had truly sent his angel, whereas before he thought quite literally that he was having a vision (cf. 12:9b). D05, in other words, indicates that Peter’s belief that God was show- ing him a vision (such as he had had before, cf. 10:10-16) is corrected; B03, on the other hand, simply portrays Peter as becoming certain in his knowledge that what was happening was real. ( ξαπ στειλεν) κ ριο B P74vid Ψ 614. 1611. 1837. 2344. 2412 | θε 36. 242. 323. 431. 453. 522. 945. (1241). 1739. 1891. 2298 p ‖ κ ριο D ) A E H L P 049. 056. 33 M. The omission of the article before κ ριο can be explained partly by the fact that Peter’s words echo those of Jethro, Moses’ father-in-law, on learning of the deliverance of the Israelites from Pharaoh (Exod. 18:8-11) and that κ ριο is anarthrous in the LXX of that passage. However, in both instances, the omission of the article may well arise on the grounds of salience: this is the first time that Peter has become aware of the presence of the Lord throughout his escape from prison, and that Jethro learns of the Lord’s action in freeing his people. Their reference to ‘the Lord’ is consequently, from their point of view, a first mention. The presence of the article takes account of neither of these factors, both of them typically more usually observed in the D05 text than that of B0330. 12 συνιδ ν τε B P74 ) E H L P Ψ 049. 056. 1739 M | συν. δ A 33. 36. 81. 242. 257. 330. 431. 440. 453. 522. 927. 945. 1245. 1270. 1505. 1837. 2344. 2401. 2495 e gig p r sa; Theoph ‖ κα συν. D d | συνιδ ν mae aeth. The variants τε and δ could be dependent one on the other by reason of phonetic confusion whereas κα in D05 is distinct, introducing as it does a step that is linked to the Peter’s new-found awareness (12:11) but not as closely as with τε. 30 See Read-Heimerdinger, The Bezan Text, 139–43; 294, 296.