Joost Smit Sibinga, «From Anointing to Arrest. Some Observations on the Composition of Mark 14:1-52», Vol. 23 (2010) 3-35
The article investigates the composition of Mark 14:1-52, in particular the words of Jesus, who speaks 14 times, including the four "Amen-words". The analysis is based mainly on the number of syllabes but also on the number of words used in the text. It reveals an ingenious design of considerable refinement and complexity. Mark"s composition method appears to be determined by a remarkable sense of order and technical precision and by a high degree of professional literary skill.
26 Joost Smit Sibinga
with its main part, v. 45-52, which as we saw is organized in 19 + 57 +
19 = 95 words.
The little elementary mathematics we have indulged in makes it easy to
see through the well conceived composition plan of this episode - though
to my mind we moderns, in order to become familiar with the facts,
do need the help of charts such as provided here; we even need several
ones, as one supplements the other. In principle, however, the logic of this
design appears to be rather simple. The size of the words of Jesus in v.
48b-49, 56 s., may have helped to inspire it; it may also have been adjusted
to the overall design. It also functions as a gnomon, as we shall see.
13.2.5 Within this overall design two significant details, the betrayer’s
evil intention as worded in v. 44b and his kiss, the ultimate act of betrayal
in v. 45c, ask for further comment.
As to Judas’ prearranged signal, the segment v. 44-46 is firmly
structured by a combination of repetitio and stylistic variatio:
v. 44bc: «ὃν ἂν φιλήσω αὐτός ἐστιν˙ κρατήσατε αὐτόν...»
v. 45c, 46: .. κατεφίλησεν αὐτόν .. καὶ ἐκράτησαν αὐτόν.
The size of the segment is 81 syllables (see Chart 9a); it divides into 25
syllables spoken by Judas (D) and 56 syllables of N(arrative), and this is,
as one sees from the bottom line of Chart 9a, identical with the division
within the D(iscourse) part of the whole story. In two ways the 25 (= 5²)
s. of Judas’ words are supplemented into a larger square, 81 (= 9²), by the
gnomon of 56 s. For a modern reader, 9² - 5² = (9 + 5) x ( 9 - 5) = 14 x 4 = 56.
The ancients would have represented the square numbers geometrically,
adding (2n + 1) units to n² as often as required.46 In any case, the formal
arrangement of v. 44-46 is identical with that of the D(iscourse) section
of the entire passage. Moreover, the account of the arrest, v. 44-46, is
again made part of the larger square v. 44-47, now including the incident
with the High Priest’s slave, and measuring 81 + 40 = 121 (= 11²) s.
The moment of the kiss itself (Mark 14:45c) is given an extra dramatic
dimension in Matthew 26:50 as well as in Luke 22:48: Jesus reacts by a
remark or a direct question addressed to Judas. In Mark we may have
to introduce a slight pause after his greeting ‘Rabbi!’ (v. 45b), before (v.
45c) καὶ κατεφίλησεν αὐτόν. Here, at v. 45b/c, the narrative divides into
112 + 192 (= 304) s., that is: 19 x 16 is divided into (7 x 16) + (12 x
16); approximating the golden mean of nineteen in natural numbers one
arrives at 12 and 7.47
See, e.g., Ivor Thomas, Selections Illustrating the History of Greek Mathematics, Lon-
46
don, Cambridge, Mass.: Heinemann, Harvard University Press, 1951, I, p. 86-88, 98-99.
47
In modern terms: 19 = 11.742 + 7.258.