Alexander Loney, «Narrative Structure and Verbal Aspect Choice in Luke.», Vol. 18 (2005) 3-31
In order to represent the actions of past-time narrative, Luke can choose
to employ either the aorist or the imperfect tense, that is, either the perfective
or the imperfective aspect. By selecting one tense over the other Luke
manipulates verbal aspect to give organization to his episodic narrative and
to create contrastive prominence (enargeia) within individual pericopes. In
this way, he follows in the tradition of his historiographical predecessors
–most notably Thucydides– who, through their subtle play with verbal aspect,
composed narratives concerned with at once the factual representation
of the past and their own contemporary, didactic purposes.
Narrative Structure and Verbal Aspect Choice in Luke 21
tism in the Jordan (3,21-22). Intervening between this pericope and the
temptation of chapter four is Luke’s version of Jesus’ genealogy (3,23-38).
Given its non-narrative function, this genealogy should be viewed as an
aside not directly advancing the storyline. Luke chooses to place it after
Jesus’ baptism to draw attention to his chosen nature as messiah, building
on the special recognition he received in his baptism with the declaration
of the heavenly voice: “You are my beloved son. In you I am well-pleasedâ€58.
After a long sequence of naming the ancestors preceding Jesus, the final
words of the genealogy, “the [son] of Godâ€59, dramatically wrap up the
aside and tie it back into the epiphanic proclamation of v. 22. Thus, the
genealogy is an extension of the baptismal pericope.
Making this connection of the genealogy to the baptism even more
apparent is the cadence of 4,1-2. It serves the dual purpose of closing the
preceding pericope and introducing the following one, hence it is “transi-
tionalâ€. This instance is a particularly good example of the cadence’s dual
nature because its narrative information parallels its linguistic function.
In 3,21-22, the action takes place at the river Jordan, while the action
of the next pericope occurs in the desert. The words of the cadence link
these two dramatic locations in the span of a single verse: Jesus goes
“from the Jordan†and is led “in the desertâ€. Hence, the verse transfers
the narrative of the story from one pericope to the next via both its literal
statement of a change in setting and its verbal cadence, while stressing
the continuity of both pericopes through the reoccurrence of the spirit as
an important detail, which comes upon him in his baptism and guides in
his temptation.
III. The Case Study of the Fourth Chapter of Luke’s Gospel
With these structural and perspectival functions of verbal aspect
choice in view, particularly in cadential formulas, let us now take a
detailed look at each of the narrative pericopes of chapter four. I shall
discuss the possible reasons for Luke’s selection of aspect throughout,
drawing particular attention to the mode of discourse and the transitions
between sections.
The first section that we shall look at runs from vv. 1-15, describing
Jesus’ testing in the wilderness and the circumstances immediately sur-
rounding it. This passage is, as a whole, one episode in the early ministry
of Jesus. In style, it is a simplified historical narrative. The action and
58
Luke 3,22, author’s translation.
59
Luke 3,38, author’s translation.