Wilson de Angelo Cunha, «A Brief Discussion of MT Isaiah 24,14-16», Vol. 90 (2009) 530-544
Recent scholarship interprets Isaiah 24,14-16 in light of a “prophetic disputation pattern” genre, which sees the praise in vv. 14-15 as an assertion and the “I” statement in v. 16b as the counter-assertion, thus, correcting the assertion in vv. 14-15. This article seeks to challenge this interpretation and argue that the “I” statement in v. 16b does not need to function as a “counter-assertion” to the praise in vv. 14-15 but, rather, as introducing the proclamation of judgment for the unrighteous (v. 16c).
A Brief Discussion of MT Isaiah 24,14-16 533
beginning of their salvation (vv. 14-16a), the latter envisions the start
of their judgment (14). Thus, this commentator postulated two opposing
views in vv. 14-16: that of the Jews (vv. 14-16a) and that of the poet (v.
16b).
This position has developed into what is now called “a disputation
patternâ€, which sees an opposition between the unidentified “they†(v.
14a) and the “I†statement (v. 16b) (15). The latter is taken as the
prophet’s counter-assertion to his opponents’ assertion in vv. 14-15.
According to this view, whereas the “they†(v. 14a) see their salvation
in the judgment of the earth in vv. 1-13, the prophet (v. 16a)
understands that the “they†will not be spared from the judgment in vv.
1-13 (16).
The interpretation of vv. 14-23 as a form of the “prophetic
disputation pattern†usually involves the following aspects: first, a
sharp separation between vv. 14.13; second, the identification of the
hmh in v. 14 as the ≈rah bçwy “inhabitant of the earth†of v. 17; third, the
interpretation of qydxl ybx as a divine title, has led some scholars to take
v. 16a as part of the praise in vv. 14-15; and, fourth, the interpretation
of rm'aow: in v. 16 as introducing a contrast between the prophet and the
praise that preceded it.
Other scholars did not accept the claim that the “I†statement in v.
16b functions as a corrective to the praise of the unidentified “they†in
vv. 14-15.16a. One scholar read vv. 14-16a as an expression of
salvation for Israel and vv. 16b-20 as a declaration of judgment for the
law breakers (cf. Isa 24,5). Likewise, is read the phrase qydxl ybx in v.
16a as a reference to “devout Jews†who, in distinction to the law
breakers of Isa 24,5, had not broken the law (17).
In a similar vein, another scholar rejected reading vv. 14-18 as
(14) Cf. MARTI’s (Jesaja, 185) claims: “‘Jene’ sehen die Situation anders an als
der Verf†and “Anders urteilt unser Dichter. Nein! sagt er, nicht ybix], sondern yzir:,
nicht Sieg, sondern Siechtum, nicht Anbruch der Glanzzeit, sonder Fortschritt der
Krankheit; wehe mir!†(his italics).
(15) Cf. SWEENEY, Isaiah, 328; LOETE, “Praiseâ€, 231.
(16) Thus SWEENEY (Isaiah, 329): “vv. 16ab-20 therefore indicate that
YHWH’s actions, praised by the inhabitants of the earth in vv. 14-16aa, will in
fact lead to their demiseâ€.
(17) Cf. KAISER, Isaiah, 188-190: “it is scarcely possible to base upon it the
theory that there was a disagreement within Judaism, one group seeing the onset of
salvation in a particular event which had already come about, and another whose
spokesman insists here that the time of salvation will be preceded by the judgment
of the worldâ€.