Terrance Callan, «The Style of Galatians», Vol. 88 (2007) 496-516
Especially since the publication of H. D. Betz’s commentary in 1979 much attention has been given to rhetorical analysis of Paul’s letter to the Galatians. Discussion has focused on the species of Galatians’ rhetoric, i.e., whether it is forensic, deliberative or epideictic; little attention has been given to its style. This paper is an attempt to supply that lack. It begins by describing stylistic ornamentation of Galatians with respect to vocabulary and syntax and proceeds to discuss the presence of plain, middle and grand styles in Galatians. Finally it considers the implications of stylistic analysis for interpretation of Galatians.
The Style of Galatians 503
Dionysius of Halicarnassus and Quintilian (Institutio Oratoria
9.4.107); Quintilian does not approve ending with a paean (Institutio
Oratoria 9.4.110-111). Dionysus of Halicarnassus approves use of
anapest and hypobacchius. Cicero thinks the first kind of paean should
be used at the beginning of a sentence (cf. also Quintilian Institutio
Oratoria 9.4.111); however, it is used at the end of six sentences in
Galatians (22). Quintilian says that the cretic makes an excellent ending,
but disapproves preceding it with a trochee (Institutio Oratoria
9.4.107). This happens twice in Galatians (i.e., in 2,13.18).
Quintilian cautions that he does not recommend too great attention
to rhythm (Institutio Oratoria 9.4.112-116; cf. Cicero, De Oratore
3.193). Augustine says that Paul and other scriptural writers seem not
to pay much attention to harmonious ending of sentences, as far as he
can tell from reading them in Latin translation. The one specific
example he discusses is Romans 13,14 (On Christian Doctrine
4.20.40-41). In Galatians insufficient attention to the ending of
sentences might be indicated most of all by the times sentences end
with tribrach; everyone seems to agree that this is a poor ending. It
might also be indicated by the six times sentences end with the second
kind of paean; those who approve of the paean think this type should
be used at the beginning not the end of a sentence. Some of the other
sentence endings used in Galatians would also be found wanting by
some, as indicated by the opinions mentioned above. However, for the
most part the sentences of Galatians conclude in ways that are widely
approved.
3. Figures of speech and thought
Galatians includes the following figures of speech: anadiplosis (2);
antimereia (2); asyndeton (7); chiasm (5); correction (4); elimination
(expeditio) (6); ellipsis (6); epanalepsis (1); paronomasia (2);
pleonasm (2); polyptoton (2); proverbs (2) (23); reduplication (5);
synonymy (1); transplacement (7) (24).
(22) At the ends of Gal 3,17b.18a.29; 4,9.24b; 6,9
(23) Betz (Galatians, 291) sees 5,25-6,10 as a series of sententiae.
(24) Anadiplosis in 4,31–5,1 (BULLINGER, Figures of Speech, 255 —
“freedom†repeated at the end of one sentence and the beginning of another); 5,7-
8 (related words end 5,7 and begin 5,8); antimereia in 1,14 (BULLINGER, Figures
of Speech, 497 — noun used for adjective); 2,11 (BULLINGER, Figures of Speech,
494 — participle used for adjective); asyndeton (see Ad Herennium 4.41) in 3,13-
14 (LONGENECKER, Galatians, 121; MORLAND, Rhetoric of Curse, 215); 3,28 (cf.