Terrance Callan, «The Style of Galatians», Vol. 88 (2007) 496-516
Especially since the publication of H. D. Betz’s commentary in 1979 much attention has been given to rhetorical analysis of Paul’s letter to the Galatians. Discussion has focused on the species of Galatians’ rhetoric, i.e., whether it is forensic, deliberative or epideictic; little attention has been given to its style. This paper is an attempt to supply that lack. It begins by describing stylistic ornamentation of Galatians with respect to vocabulary and syntax and proceeds to discuss the presence of plain, middle and grand styles in Galatians. Finally it considers the implications of stylistic analysis for interpretation of Galatians.
The Style of Galatians 509
style, and at the end Galatians rises into a temperate (i.e., middle)
eloquence (44). Augustine does not specify exactly where the latter
happens.
Drawing upon a number of different sources, Duane Watson
describes the plain style as
“plain, to the point, explaining everything and making every point
clear rather than impressive, using a refined, concise style stripped of
ornamentâ€. It is restrained, concise, avoiding long clauses which tend
to elevation of style. It uses current idiom, colloquial language, avoids
compound words and ambiguity, and uses natural word order. The
plain style has no force or vigor, utilizes only moderate amplification,
and avoids accumulation. However, it does try to be vivid through the
use of enargeia. The plain style uses few figures and such use is
subdued. Figures should be spread throughout the speech. Figures of
speech are more suited than figures of thought, and when figures of
thought are used they should not be glaring. Maxims are a dominant
feature. Metaphors should be used most of all because they are usually
colloquial, but they should be used modestly and be of a mild nature.
Parisosis, homoeoteleuton, paronomasia, and all figures of repetition
are unsuited to the plain style because they are obvious art (35).
The most extensive discussion of the plain style is found in
Demetrius, On Style 190-239, which is one of the sources for Watson’s
description. Demetrius says that the subject of discourse in the plain
style should be simple. Diction should be normal and familiar and not
metaphorical (190), avoiding compounds and neologisms (191).
Above all the plain style must be clear (191). Clarity is produced
by use of connectives, i.e., avoidance of asyndeton (192), by
epanalepsis, i.e., resumptive repetition of a particle in the course of a
long sentence (e.g., repetition of the beginning of a sentence at its end)
(196), by avoiding use of dependent constructions (198), by using
natural word order, i.e., beginning a sentence with either the subject or
predicate (200), and by not using long periods (202).
The plain style should avoid long clauses (204). The closing words
of clauses should reach a secure and perceptible end (206). It should
avoid hiatus between long vowels and diphthongs; any hiatus should
be between short vowels or a short and long (207). It should avoid
conspicuous figures (208).
Vividness and persuasiveness are especially appropriate to the plain
style (208). Vividness is produced by use of precise detail and from
(35) D.F. WATSON, Invention, Arrangement, and Style. Rhetorical Criticism of
Jude and 2 Peter (SBLDS 104; Atlanta, GA 1988) 25-26.