Terrance Callan, «The Style of Galatians», Vol. 88 (2007) 496-516
Especially since the publication of H. D. Betz’s commentary in 1979 much attention has been given to rhetorical analysis of Paul’s letter to the Galatians. Discussion has focused on the species of Galatians’ rhetoric, i.e., whether it is forensic, deliberative or epideictic; little attention has been given to its style. This paper is an attempt to supply that lack. It begins by describing stylistic ornamentation of Galatians with respect to vocabulary and syntax and proceeds to discuss the presence of plain, middle and grand styles in Galatians. Finally it considers the implications of stylistic analysis for interpretation of Galatians.
514 Terrance Callan
awareness of them as metaphors (39). The one exception to this is
metaphorical use of crucifixion (40).
Although the metaphors Paul uses most often in Galatians are
conventional, they are central to the argument of Galatians (41). One
indication of their importance for Paul is that two of his new coinages
develop the metaphors of the family of God and running/walking,
namely yeudadevlfou" in 2,4 and ojrqopodou'sin in 2,14. Another
indication is that, as we have noted above, Paul’s unconventional
(39) R. Aasgaard has shown that metaphorical use of family language was
common in antiquity, above all among Jews (“My Beloved Brothers and Sisters!â€
Christian Siblingship in Paul [Early Christianity in Context; JSNTSS 265;
London 2004] 107-116); see also P.A. HARLAND, “Familial Dimensions of Group
Identity: ‘Brothers’ (∆Adelfoiv) in Associations of the Greek Eastâ€, JBL 124 (2005)
491-513; and T. CALLAN, Psychological Perspectives on the Life of Paul. An
Application of the Methodology of Gerd Theissen (Studies in the Bible and Early
Christianity 22; Lewiston – Queenston – Lampeter 1990) 83-92. On use of
slavery as a metaphor see I.A.H. COMBES, The Metaphor of Slavery in the
Writings of the Early Church. From the New Testament to the Beginning of the
Fifth Century (JSNTSS 156; Sheffield 1998) 43-48. Combes observes that slavery
is used in the OT as positive image of relationship with God (pp. 43-44); this use
is limited in the Hellenic world (pp. 44-45). It is used in the OT as a negative
image of idolatry, but not of being mastered by passions, etc. (pp. 45-46); the
latter is common in the Hellenic world (pp. 46-48). On use of running as an image
for spiritual achievement in the Greek world see O. BAUERNFEIND, “trevcw ktlâ€,
TDNT, VIII, 228-229; as part of his discussion of athletic imagery in general V.C.
Pfitzner (Paul and the Agon Motif. Traditional Athletic Imagery in the Pauline
Literature [NTS 16; Leiden 1967] 23-75) discusses use of running as an image on
pages 31, 49-51. According to H. Seeseman and G. Bertram (“patevw ktlâ€, TDNT
V, 940-945) use of walking as an image for the conduct of life is alien to classical
Greek (p. 941) but frequent in the Septuagint (pp. 942-943). According to F.
Hauck fruit is used as an image for “productâ€, “resultâ€, or “gain†in secular Greek,
the Septuagint and later Jewish literature (“karpov" ktlâ€, TDNT III, 614-615).
Sowing is used metaphorically in the Greek world in general and by Philo in
particular (S. Schulz and G. QUELL, “spevrma ktlâ€, TDNT VII, 537, 544); likewise
reaping is used as an image of consequences in secular and Jewish Greek (F.
HAUCK, “qerivzw ktlâ€, TDNT III, 132-133).
(40) According to Hengel (Crucifixion, 66-68) crucifixion is not used
metaphorically at all in the non-Christian Greek world and is only used as a
negative metaphor in the Latin world. A positive use of crucifixion as a metaphor
that is somewhat different than Paul’s use is found in the sayings of Jesus in Mark
8,34-35 / Matt 16,24-25 / Luke 9,23-24 (cf. the parallel to the second verse in
John 12,25) and Matt 10,38-39 / Luke 14,27 & 17,33.
(41) Aasgaard speaks of “the frequency, the intensity, the variation, and the
conscious ways†Paul has used the family metaphors in his letters (Beloved
Brothers and Sisters, 306).