Terrance Callan, «The Style of Galatians», Vol. 88 (2007) 496-516
Especially since the publication of H. D. Betz’s commentary in 1979 much attention has been given to rhetorical analysis of Paul’s letter to the Galatians. Discussion has focused on the species of Galatians’ rhetoric, i.e., whether it is forensic, deliberative or epideictic; little attention has been given to its style. This paper is an attempt to supply that lack. It begins by describing stylistic ornamentation of Galatians with respect to vocabulary and syntax and proceeds to discuss the presence of plain, middle and grand styles in Galatians. Finally it considers the implications of stylistic analysis for interpretation of Galatians.
The Style of Galatians 513
In addition to these metaphors 5,1-24 includes other tropes. We
find antonomasia in v. 8, hyperbaton in vv. 4 and 7-8, hyperbole in v.
15 and metonymy in vv. 5 and 12. We find the figures of speech
anadiplosis in 4,31-5,1, asyndeton in vv. 4, 19-21 and 22, chiasm in v.
17, ellipsis in vv. 4 and 17, elimination in v. 6, paronomasia in vv. 2-3
and 7-8, a proverb in v. 9, and transplacement in vv. 7-8. We also find
the figures of thought antithesis in v. 17, questions in vv. 7 and 11, and
understatement in vv. 8a and 23b.
5,25-6,10 is also ornamented, but less so than 5,1-24. In the former
passage Paul uses one of his rare words in 6,3. He uses the metaphor
of the family of God in 6,10, the metaphor of running and walking in
5,25, an agricultural metaphor in 6,7-9, and another metaphor in 6,2
and 5. We also find the figures of speech chiasm in 5,25 and 6,8, and
a proverb in 6,7. As we have noted above, Betz sees 5,25-6,10 as a
series of sententiae (38).
V. Implications of Stylistic Analysis for Interpretation of Galatians
Reflection on the style of Galatians makes us aware that for the
most part it is carefully written in plain style. This implies that it
intends above all to form the minds of the Galatians both by
communicating knowledge and by presenting convincing arguments.
Adapting the teaching of Cicero, Augustine says that the subdued (i.e.,
plain) style should be used to teach (docere; Cicero says probere
“proveâ€), the temperate (i.e., middle) style to delight, and the grand
(i.e., full) style to move the hearer (On Christian Doctrine 4.27, 34).
The subdued style should be used when addressing knotty questions,
and the temperate style for praise and blame (52). Obviously, the grand
style should be used to shape the will.
I would argue that the pleading section of the letter (4,12–6,10)
begins with 4,12-20. It is here that Paul makes his main request of the
addressees. The grand style is appropriate as Paul attempts to move the
Galatians to grant his request. The middle style is appropriate to the
latter part of the pleading section, where Paul elaborates his plea,
presuming that he has won the Galatians over.
Reflection on the style of Galatians also calls attention to the
prominence of metaphors in Galatians. The most common metaphors
are thoroughly conventional and so probably used without special
(38) BETZ, Galatians, 291.