Terrance Callan, «The Style of Galatians», Vol. 88 (2007) 496-516
Especially since the publication of H. D. Betz’s commentary in 1979 much attention has been given to rhetorical analysis of Paul’s letter to the Galatians. Discussion has focused on the species of Galatians’ rhetoric, i.e., whether it is forensic, deliberative or epideictic; little attention has been given to its style. This paper is an attempt to supply that lack. It begins by describing stylistic ornamentation of Galatians with respect to vocabulary and syntax and proceeds to discuss the presence of plain, middle and grand styles in Galatians. Finally it considers the implications of stylistic analysis for interpretation of Galatians.
The Style of Galatians 501
2. Rhythm
With regard to rhythm, Cicero approvingly quotes Aristotle as
prohibiting frequent use of iamb (short – long) and tribrach (short –
short – short) and recommending primary use of the heroic foot, i.e.,
the dactyl (long – short – short) (15). Aristotle also especially approves
of the paean (either long – short – short – short, or short – short – short
– long), the former kind at the beginning of a sentence, and the latter
at the end. Cicero comments that the latter kind of paean is almost the
same as the cretic (long – short – long) (3.182-183). Sentences should
end with either the trochee (long – short) or dactyl or either of them
alternating with the second kind of paean or the cretic (3.193).
Dionysius of Halicarnassus describes the twelve possible two- and
three-syllable feet and evaluates each (On Literary Composition 17).
The pyrrhic (short – short) is not impressive or solemn, while the
spondee (long – long) is. The iamb is not ignoble, but the trochee is.
The tribrach is a mean foot, but the molossus (long – long – long) is
elevated. The amphibrach (short – long – short) is effeminate and
ignoble. The anapest (short – short – long) and the dactyl are both very
beautiful. The cretic is not ignoble. Both the bacchius (long – long –
short) and hypobacchius (short – long – long) have dignity and
grandeur.
Quintilian’s discussion of rhythm (in Institutio Oratoria 9.4.45-
120) is less prescriptive. He too describes the twelve possible two- and
three-syllable feet (79-82) and argues that each has its proper use in
prose (83, 87-89). He says that one should be concerned about no more
than the last three feet of a sentence, nor fewer than two (95), and
illustrates the effect of using various feet to conclude a sentence (95-
111). He notes that Asian writers frequently end a sentence with two
trochees (103).
The most common foot at the end of the sentences in Galatians is
the trochee, found forty times (16). This accords with the
(15) Aristotle, Rhetoric 3.8. Aristotle speaks of the iamb and the trochee, and
these are the words Cicero uses. However, Cicero understands trochee to mean
what is commonly called tribrach and so misunderstands Aristotle, who does not
use trochee in this sense. Aristotle’s heroic foot may include spondee and anapest,
as well as dactyl. Cicero summarizes the views of Aristotle somewhat differently,
and less accurately, in Orator 191-196.
(16) At the ends of Gal 1,11.17; 2,3.10.17b.19b.20a; 3,3.10a.10b.16b.
20.21b.22.24.25.27.28a; 4,2.5.17.27.28; 5,1a.1b.3.7b.14.15.16.17a.17b.21.23a.
25.26; 6,3.11.12.13.