Terrance Callan, «The Style of Galatians», Vol. 88 (2007) 496-516
Especially since the publication of H. D. Betz’s commentary in 1979 much attention has been given to rhetorical analysis of Paul’s letter to the Galatians. Discussion has focused on the species of Galatians’ rhetoric, i.e., whether it is forensic, deliberative or epideictic; little attention has been given to its style. This paper is an attempt to supply that lack. It begins by describing stylistic ornamentation of Galatians with respect to vocabulary and syntax and proceeds to discuss the presence of plain, middle and grand styles in Galatians. Finally it considers the implications of stylistic analysis for interpretation of Galatians.
500 Terrance Callan
antonomasia (8 times), hyperbole (4 times), metonymy (11 times) and
synecdoche (twice) (14).
II. The Syntax of Galatians
1. Hiatus
Quintilian says that for successive words to end and begin with
two long vowels, especially when they are the same, and most
especially the vowels ‘o’ and ‘a,’ constitutes the worst problem. But he
also says that he is not sure whether too little or too much care to avoid
hiatus is the worse (Institutio Oratoria 9.4.33-37). Quintilian says that
for successive words to end and begin with ‘s’ or ‘x’ is jarring
(Institutio Oratoria 9.4.37-38).
There seems to be little indication that Paul has made any great
effort to avoid these problems in Galatians. In the first 7 verses of the
letter, I count 20 instances of hiatus. However, none of these is an
instance of successive words ending and beginning with the long
vowels ‘o’ or ‘a.’ Likewise the first 7 verses of the letter include no
instance of successive words ending and beginning with ‘s’ or ‘x’.
(14) Antonomasia in Gal 1,6.15 (twice).23; 2,8; 3,5 (twice); 5,8; hyperbole in
1,9 (MORLAND, Rhetoric of Curse, 149, n. 43; E.W. Bullinger [Figures of Speech
Used in the Bible Explained and Illustrated {London 1898} 427] sees the
reference to an angel in v. 8 as a hyperbolic hypothesis); 4,1 oujde;n diafevrei
douvlou (BETZ, Galatians, 203, n. 12; LONGENECKER, Galatians, 162); 4,15
(BULLINGER, Figures of Speech, 426); 5,15 davknete kai; katesqiete — ajnalwqh'te
v
(BETZ, Galatians, 277; LONGENECKER, Galatians, 244); metonymy in 1,8-9
(MORLAND, Rhetoric of Curse, 152 — the expression “be a curse†is metonymy);
1,23 (BULLINGER, Figures of Speech, 599 — faith in place of the thing believed);
2,7-9.12 to; euaggelion th" akrobustia" / th'" peritomh" (BURTON, Galatians, 93,
j v 'j v '
94); 3,2.5 (BULLINGER, Figures of Speech, 602 — faith in place of the thing
believed); 3,13a (BULLINGER, Figures of Speech, 591; BURTON, Galatians, 171;
MORLAND, Rhetoric of Curse, 115, 220 — the expression “be a curse†is
metonymy); 3,23 (BULLINGER, Figures of Speech, 572, 599 — faith in place of the
thing believed); 5,5 (BULLINGER, Figures of Speech, 599 — faith in place of the
thing believed); 5,12 (MORLAND, Rhetoric of Curse, 171, n. 119 — Bengel says
that Paul refers to cutting away the foreskin but takes it to represent expulsion of
the opponents); 6,14 (BULLINGER, Figures of Speech, 612 — cross = the
atonement accomplished via the cross and the resultant blessings); synecdoche in
1,8-9 (MORLAND, Rhetoric of Curse, 115, 150, 152 — by referring to himself/his
coworkers and to an angel the whole field of possible seduction is implied); 1,16
(BULLINGER, Figures of Speech, 645 — flesh and blood for human being).