Andrew Wilson, «Scribal Habits in Greek New Testament Manuscripts.», Vol. 24 (2011) 95-126
New Testament textual criticism lays considerable stress upon the ways that scribes altered the text. Singular readings provide the most objective and reliable guide to the sorts of errors scribes produced. This paper reports on a study of 4200 singular readings from 33 chapters of the New Testament, providing new insights into scribal habits and the history of the text.
Scribal Habits in Greek New Testament Manuscripts 103
over time. Compared to rival theories, such as a scribal tendency to add
or authoritative editorial recension36, ad hoc correction offers superior
scientific and historical credentials in terms of evidence, explanatory
power and economy.
In the present study, for example, Sinaiticus had 90% of the singular
omissions corrected (56/62) but only 78% of additions (28/36). Similar
results can be seen in the correction of