Andrew Wilson, «Scribal Habits in Greek New Testament Manuscripts.», Vol. 24 (2011) 95-126
New Testament textual criticism lays considerable stress upon the ways that scribes altered the text. Singular readings provide the most objective and reliable guide to the sorts of errors scribes produced. This paper reports on a study of 4200 singular readings from 33 chapters of the New Testament, providing new insights into scribal habits and the history of the text.
Scribal Habits in Greek New Testament Manuscripts 101
Griesbach’s canon fares better when we look at possible mechanical
explanations for omissions (like homoeoteleuton and homoeoarcton, as
seen in the last three rows of the table). These were found to be the pri-
mary possible cause among longer omissions (i.e. three words or longer),
although they were a minority among shorter omissions. Even so, there
were 124 omissions that were not attributable to homoeoteleuton or ho-
moeoarcton among the 323 longer singular omissions. Thus, for 38% of
longer omissions, there was no mechanical explanation which presented
itself. This result will not surprise those familiar with early MSS like