Andrew Wilson, «Scribal Habits in Greek New Testament Manuscripts.», Vol. 24 (2011) 95-126
New Testament textual criticism lays considerable stress upon the ways that scribes altered the text. Singular readings provide the most objective and reliable guide to the sorts of errors scribes produced. This paper reports on a study of 4200 singular readings from 33 chapters of the New Testament, providing new insights into scribal habits and the history of the text.
96 Andrew Wilson
grounds, in a manner as free as possible from any presuppositions about
scribal behavior”6. Juan Hernández Jr. writes that singular readings are
“the safest place to speak confidently about scribal tendencies”7.
The present paper reports results from a study of 4200 singular read-
ings in 33 chapters8 from the NT, thus covering more than 10% of the
entire text. The study isolated singular readings using a combination
of the following critical apparatuses: NA279, Swanson10, Tischendorf11,
von Soden12, IGNTP Luke13, the Novum Testamentum Graecum Editio
Critica Maior14 (ECM) in the Catholic Epistles and Hoskier’s Text of the
Apocalypse15 for Revelation. These critical apparatuses were used on the
basis of consistency and comprehensiveness in citing variant readings16.
In the study, the following types of singular readings were excluded:
6
Royse, Scribal Habits, 2008, 11.
7
Hernández, Scribal Habits, 2006, 154.
8
Matthew chapters 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 20, 21 and 26, Mark 1, 2, 3 and 6, Luke 10
and 11, John 4, 7 and 9, Acts 5, 10 and 15, Romans 12, 1 Corinthians 13, Galatians 1 and
2, James 1, 1 John 1, 2 and 5, and Revelation 1 and 5.
9
B. Aland – K. Aland – J. Karavidopoulos – C.M. Martini – B.M. Metzger (ed.), Nestle-
Aland Novum Testamentum Graece, 27th Edition, 8th (revised) impression (Stuttgart
2001).
10
R.J. Swanson, New Testament Greek Manuscripts: Variant Readings Arranged in
Horizontal Lines against Codex Vaticanus (Sheffield – Pasadena, CA, Vols. 1-5, 1995-98);
(Wheaton, IL – Pasadena, CA, Vols. 6-7, 1999 and 2001).
11
C. von Tischendorf, Novum Testamentum Graece: ad antiquissimos testes denuo
recensuit. 8th Edition (Leipzig 1869-72).
12
H. von Soden, Die Schriften des Neuen Testaments in ihrer ältesten erreichbaren
Textgestalt hergestellt auf Grund ihrer Textgeschichte (Göttingen 1913).
13
American and British Committees of the International Greek New Testament Project
(ed.), The New Testament in Greek: The Gospel according to Luke, Part One: Chapters
1-12, Part Two: Chapters 13-24 (Oxford 1984-87).
14
B. Aland – K. Aland – G. Mink – K. Wachtel (ed.), Novum Testamentum Graecum,
Editio Critica Maior, 4: Catholic Letters, Installment 1: James, Installment 3: 1 John
(Stuttgart 1997 and 2003).
15
H.C. Hoskier, Concerning the Text of the Apocalypse: Collations of All Existing
Available Greek Documents with the Standard Text of Stephen’s Third Edition together
with the Testimony of Versions, Commentaries and Fathers. A Complete Conspectus of all
Authorities (London 1929).
16
The Kurzgefasste Liste Sigla Indices (comparing Tischendorf, von Soden and Gregory
numbers) give the following figures: over 2800 MSS in von Soden; for Tischendorf 60 majus-
cules, about 1420 Gospel minuscules, 520 minuscules for Acts and the Catholic epistles and
525 minuscules for Paul (K. Aland, Kurzegefasste Liste der griechischen Handschriften des
Neuen Testaments (ANTF 1; Berlin 1994) 377-401); NA27 lists over 1400 MSS; Swanson
uses about 150 MSS; IGNTP Luke has 238 MSS; ECM has 182 in James and Hoskier has
220 in Revelation. These apparatuses thus claim to be based on well in excess of 3000
manuscripts, more than half of all Greek NT manuscripts. The majority of the manuscripts
not included in these critical apparatuses are Byzantine MSS with a highly uniform text,
the inclusion of whose evidence would add little