Iwan M. Whiteley, «Zechariah, Reference and the Structure of Revelation 6-8:1», Vol. 23 (2010) 93-108
This article argues that Rev 6-8:1 is structured on Zech 1-2. It first undertakes a survey of interpretational difficulties that exist in Revelation 6-8:1. It contains a survey of commentators’ views regarding the unit of discourse. Then there is a demonstration that structuring Rev 6-8:1 on Zech 1-2 solves many of the difficulties, notably the rapid shift in scenes in the text. An exploration of the issue of reference ensues with the intention of suggesting that one should import information from Zech 1-2 into Revelation. Consequently, there is an investigation into the meaning of Zech 1-2. Finally, information from this book is imported into Rev 6-8:1.
Zechariah, Reference and the Structure of Revelation 6-8:1 103
to the land of Israel. Zechariah’s choice of reference would suggest that
he has not forgotten his Jewish past and that the focus of his book is the
re-establishment of the land of Israel of his fathers. Consequently, I am
inclined to translate #r,a, as ‘land’ rather than earth, while acknowledging
that some contexts negate this possibility.
The final indication of an Eden motif can be seen in the promise of
Zech 1:11, “…I (Yahweh) will dwell in your midst…” In Gen 2:9, the tree of
life and knowledge of good and evil, representing God’s presence, were in
the middle of the garden.
The exact identity of the horsemen is problematic. Baldwin says that
they correspond to mounted messengers in the Persian Empire.52 Peterson
argues that since there were three colours, therefore there were actually
three groups of horsemen. He sees four as a number of completeness and
therefore three was a sign of incompleteness indicating that “though
things are at rest, they are improperly so”53. It is more likely that the
angel of Yahweh and the three groups of horsemen went throughout the
earth, but then the latter came and gave an account to the former of what
they saw.
The reason for the choice of colours for the horses is particularly
difficult. Mitchell suggests that the various colours indicated that the
horses were divided into various troops54. Although some have sought
to isolate the identity and significance of the colours,55 it is difficult to
associate them with any antecedent text and Stuhlmueller points out that
they do not appear to be significant to the prophecy56 and so they shall
not be discussed further.
The horsemen find the earth/land to be at rest and Stuhlmueller
suggests that this is referring to the end of the Persian civil war once
Darius had overcome all opposition.57 However, God’s angels are once
more roaming around the land of Israel, preparing the way for the return
of Yahweh, providing a report. The implied report is not positive; the
land is at rest because the Persians still own it and although some of the
people of Israel have returned, yet many have not.
52
J. Baldwin, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi: An Introduction and Commentary (London
1972) 95.
53
Petersen, Haggai and Zechariah, 143.
54
H. Mitchell, J. Smith, J. Bewer, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on Haggai,
Zechariah, Malachi, and Jonah (Edinburgh 1951) 119.
55
See W. McHardy, “The Horses in Zechariah”, In memoriam Paul Kahle (Berlin 1968)
174-179; B. Peachey, “A Horse of a Different Colour, the Horses in Zechariah and Revela-
tion”, ExpTim 110 (1998-1999) 214-215; Meyers, Haggai, Zechariah, 111-113.
56
C. Stuhlmueller, Rebuilding with Hope: A Commentary on the Books of Haggai and
Zechariah (Edinburgh 1988) 62.
57
Stuhlmueller, Rebuilding, 63.