Iwan M. Whiteley, «Zechariah, Reference and the Structure of Revelation 6-8:1», Vol. 23 (2010) 93-108
This article argues that Rev 6-8:1 is structured on Zech 1-2. It first undertakes a survey of interpretational difficulties that exist in Revelation 6-8:1. It contains a survey of commentators’ views regarding the unit of discourse. Then there is a demonstration that structuring Rev 6-8:1 on Zech 1-2 solves many of the difficulties, notably the rapid shift in scenes in the text. An exploration of the issue of reference ensues with the intention of suggesting that one should import information from Zech 1-2 into Revelation. Consequently, there is an investigation into the meaning of Zech 1-2. Finally, information from this book is imported into Rev 6-8:1.
Zechariah, Reference and the Structure of Revelation 6-8:1 105
despondent. It was proposed that Zech 1-2 was written with the desire
that the people of God would come back to the land of Israel because it
is that land that bears the promises of the coming of the eschatological
Eden of God. This could suggest that John considers the churches to be
in some form of spiritual exile and that he is calling them back into a
relationship with Jesus. This idea fits with what is seen in the Revelation
letters. Ephesus is warned that its lampstand may be taken away (an exile
motif). Jesus’ threat to fight Pergamum with the sword of His mouth
(2:16), His threat to kill Jezebel’s children “with death” (cf. Jer 14:12; 21:6;
44:13), His warning that He will come like a thief on Sardis, His telling
Laodicea that they are “wretched, pitiful, poor, blind and naked” suggests
that many of the churches are in spiritual exile and so the idea that Rev
6-8:1 is a call to come out from exile is fitting.
The only rider mentioned in Zechariah is the angel of Yahweh.
Presumably, the other riders represent the same angel. This would suggest
that the rider on the horses in Revelation might be Jesus.
The horses in Zechariah went through the land, inspecting it. The
transposition of this idea onto Revelation would suggest that the horses
are metaphorically riding through the churches. These churches have
been revealed in the letters to be spiritually deserted and the horses
are inspecting them further. This proposal appears to run against the
current trend which understands the horses to represent God’s enemies
bringing suffering on the churches. The colours of the horses were difficult
to explain in the context of Zechariah. Revelation has changed some of
the colours, suggesting that John has his own agenda for them in his
discourse, but this issue is beyond the scope of this article.
Similar to the Zechariah context, the book of Revelation seems to
assume that there are two communities in the churches; those in spiritual
exile and those that are not. This can be seen in the letters. The letter to
Pergamum suggests that there are a few people who hold to the teaching
of Balaam and the Nicolaitans, but not all (2:14-15), in the letter to
Thyatira, Jesus says, “Now I say to the rest of you… who do not hold
to [Jezebel’s] teaching” (2:24), in the letter to Sardis, we hear that “you
have a few people… who have not soiled their clothes” (3:4). These verses
demonstrate that there are two sub communities within each church.
The cry “How long?” in the fifth seal in Revelation appears to reflect
Zechariah’s frustration at the nations having a dominant influence over
the people of God. The churches of Asia Minor echo this cry of desperation
and God’s response in the Zechariah text automatically refuses to permit
the churches to become despondent: “I am very jealous for Jerusalem and
Zion, but I am very angry with the nations that feel secure. I was only
a little angry, but they added to the calamity”. Consequently, the reader