Iwan M. Whiteley, «Zechariah, Reference and the Structure of Revelation 6-8:1», Vol. 23 (2010) 93-108
This article argues that Rev 6-8:1 is structured on Zech 1-2. It first undertakes a survey of interpretational difficulties that exist in Revelation 6-8:1. It contains a survey of commentators’ views regarding the unit of discourse. Then there is a demonstration that structuring Rev 6-8:1 on Zech 1-2 solves many of the difficulties, notably the rapid shift in scenes in the text. An exploration of the issue of reference ensues with the intention of suggesting that one should import information from Zech 1-2 into Revelation. Consequently, there is an investigation into the meaning of Zech 1-2. Finally, information from this book is imported into Rev 6-8:1.
104 Iwan M. Whiteley
The issue of the four horns and craftsmen shall not be explored
here because they are not mentioned in Revelation. Next, a man with
a measuring line goes out to measure Jerusalem. He is told that the
eschatological city will be too big to be measured. The text implies that
the there is a future for Jerusalem, it will prosper and therefore the people
should come back from exile. Implicit in the text is lethargy on the part
of the people to return, apparently due to a lack of confidence in Yahweh.
Zechariah enthuses the people by resorting to two emotive images;
first the enthronement of Yahweh in their presence, bearing messianic
undertones (1:16), leading to joy (2:10)58 and second the silence of God’s
people upon Yahweh’s presence.59 Consequently, although the images of
silence and joy appear to conflict, yet they are speaking about the same
event from different angles. The former focuses on the joy that Yahweh
brings while the latter emphasizes Yahweh’s greatness and holiness,
leading to silence.60
Importation of Concepts from Zechariah 1-2 into Revelation 6-8:1
We are now in a position to import ideas from Zech 1-2 into Rev
6-8:1. We shall run systematically through both texts. Zech 1-2 is not the
only source to influence Rev 6-8:1, and it will not be possible to extend
our analysis into other areas. Consequently, we shall not be able to posit
an explanation for the full meaning for the discourse. Instead, this study
will merely suggest ideas that may be imported from Zechariah into
Revelation.
The general background of Zechariah is that a large proportion of
the people of God still live in exile due to a loss of confidence in Yahweh.
This appears to correspond with some of the churches of Asia. John’s
call to the church at Smyrna, “Do not be afraid of what you are about to
suffer” (Rev 2:10) suggests that church members are afraid and possibly
58
Baldwin, Haggai, Zechariah, 110; Redditt, Haggai, Zechariah, 61; Petersen, Haggai
and Zechariah, 179.
59
This notion conforms with Hab 2:20 and Zeph 1:7. Unger’s suggestion that the aim
is to silence raging nations fits with the idea in Hab 2:20 (Unger, Zechariah, 53), but
Achtemeier’s proposal that the silence is ‘…to catch’s one’s breath and wait in hope and
obedient faith for the final fulfilment of the prophet’s words’ is unlikely (Achtemeier, E.
Nahum-Malachi (Atlanta 1986) 121).
60
The call for people to be silent is generally adopted in the OT when someone who
is greater is in the room (Num 13:30; Judg 3:19; Neh 8:11; Hab 2:20; Zeph 1:7) see also J.
Oswalt, “hsh”, NIDOTT I, 1048.