Iwan M. Whiteley, «Zechariah, Reference and the Structure of Revelation 6-8:1», Vol. 23 (2010) 93-108
This article argues that Rev 6-8:1 is structured on Zech 1-2. It first undertakes a survey of interpretational difficulties that exist in Revelation 6-8:1. It contains a survey of commentators’ views regarding the unit of discourse. Then there is a demonstration that structuring Rev 6-8:1 on Zech 1-2 solves many of the difficulties, notably the rapid shift in scenes in the text. An exploration of the issue of reference ensues with the intention of suggesting that one should import information from Zech 1-2 into Revelation. Consequently, there is an investigation into the meaning of Zech 1-2. Finally, information from this book is imported into Rev 6-8:1.
Zechariah, Reference and the Structure of Revelation 6-8:1 107
the text. It was noted that there is a continuous shift in scene through
the discourse. The reason for the apparent interlude between the sixth
and seventh seal seemed unclear. A survey of commentators’ views raised
more questions than answers. The shift in scene that takes place in 7:1, 9
and 8:1 are particularly difficult to explain.
There followed a proposed solution to the difficulties found in Rev
6-8:1, it was argued that the text is structured on Zech 1-2. Following
Jauhiainen, it was suggested that explicit linguistic markers to referentially
connect the text to Zech 1-2 recede from the fifth seal onwards, but the
conceptual relationship between both passages remains. One important
issue in Revelation is that of the relationship between a text and its
referent. Current terminology, notably the word “allusion” is vague and
unsatisfactory to explain the relationship. It has been demonstrated that
John has consciously associated Rev 6-8:1 with Zech 1-2 and therefore
one would assume that he would expect his readers to import information
from the antecedent into Revelation. Consequently, an appropriate term
to describe the relationship between both texts is reference.
A referential relationship places an added burden on the exegete
because it leads to the conclusion that the exegete also needs to master the
context of the antecedent discourse. As a result Zech 1-2 was investigated.
The conclusion was that many of the people of God had lost confidence in
Yahweh and so had not actually come back from exile. Zechariah accepts
that Israel is still governed by the nations, but God is at work. His land is
flourishing again after all the deserted years. He assures them that God
will keep His promises, Zion will overflow with people and Yahweh will
again come and live with His remnant. When He comes, His greatness
will astound the world and the nations will come to their God.
Following this assessment there was an attempt to import this
information into Rev 6-8:1. The importation of information from
Zechariah suggests that many people in the churches are in spiritual
exile. Jesus has reconnoitred the land (that is, the churches) and his
concerns can be seen in John’s reformulation of the Zechariah horse
imagery. The faithful of the Christian community cry out “How long?”
The sixth seal shows that God is angry at the nations that have negatively
influenced the church. John adopts Zechariah’s discrete measurement of
the people of God as a literary device, demonstrating that God’s people in
the churches have been counted and remembered, he then acknowledges
that heaven will be filled with an innumerable multitude. John appears to
follow Zechariah in enthusing the churches by resorting to two emotive
images to draw the people out of spiritual exile; first he argues that Jesus’
salvation will influence the world, leading to eternal praise and second,
everything will come under His rule. Consequently, the churches should