Iwan M. Whiteley, «Zechariah, Reference and the Structure of Revelation 6-8:1», Vol. 23 (2010) 93-108
This article argues that Rev 6-8:1 is structured on Zech 1-2. It first undertakes a survey of interpretational difficulties that exist in Revelation 6-8:1. It contains a survey of commentators’ views regarding the unit of discourse. Then there is a demonstration that structuring Rev 6-8:1 on Zech 1-2 solves many of the difficulties, notably the rapid shift in scenes in the text. An exploration of the issue of reference ensues with the intention of suggesting that one should import information from Zech 1-2 into Revelation. Consequently, there is an investigation into the meaning of Zech 1-2. Finally, information from this book is imported into Rev 6-8:1.
Zechariah, Reference and the Structure of Revelation 6-8:1 95
fact since chapter 6 consists of a juxtaposition of a string of what appears
to be very loosely connected narrative. Chilton argues that chapter 7 is
a part of the sixth seal;10 this seems unlikely due to the abrupt shift in
scenery. Also the asyndeton in 7:1, followed by μετὰ τοῦτο would suggest
that its relationship with the previous text is complicated.
One has to ask why John added chapter 7. Harrington says that God is
sealing His people before the final judgment.11 He appears to be assuming
that the seventh seal is referring to final judgment although this is not clear
in 8:1. Smalley says that chapter 7 is building up suspense for the seventh
seal.12 However, the seventh seal appears to be an anticlimax compared
to what precedes. Beale argues that chapter 7, “…explains how believers
are sealed so that they can persevere through the first four tribulations
enumerated in ch. 6”13. Beale’s anaphoric interpretation is preferable than
resorting to cataphoric relationship with 8:1, although linking chapter 7
with the four horsemen in this manner is difficult to see.
Following an asyndeton (7:9), μετὰ ταῦτα generates sufficient
ambiguity to make it particularly difficult to identify the relationship
between the 144 000 and the “multitude”. Morris comments that, “…there
is little evidence to decide these points…”14 Commentators’ conclusions
can be divided into three camps, disjunctive, conjunctive and ascensive.
Bousset holds the older disjunctive position; he understands the 144 000
to represent people of Jewish nationality (including Jewish Christians)
and he appears to identify the multitude as all Christians, specifically of
gentile origin.15
Most people are currently inclined to see a conjunctive relationship
between both units, that is, there is a continuation of thought between
the 144 000 and the “multitude”. Bauckham is insightful on this point, he
compares this section to 5:5-6 where John hears that the Lion of Judah
and the root of David had conquered, but saw a slaughtered Lamb. In
a similar way, John hears a number sealed and yet sees an innumerable
multitude.16 Both images are generally considered to refer to the church
10
Contra Chilton, The Days, 201.
11
W. Harrington, Revelation (Minnesota 1993) 99.
12
S. Smalley, The Revelation to John: A Commentary on the Greek Text of the Apo-
calypse (London 2005) 177.
13
Beale, The Book, 404.
14
Morris, The Book, 111.
15
W. Bousset, Die Offenbarung Johannis (Göttingen 1906) 287-8; similarly J. Draper,
“The Heavenly Feast”, JSNT 19 (1983) 136-137; C. Rowland, Revelation, (London 1993)
91.
16
R. Bauckham, The climax of Prophecy: Studies on the Book of Revelation (Edinburgh
1993) 215-6.