Iwan M. Whiteley, «An Explanation for the Anacoloutha in the Book of Revelation.», Vol. 20 (2007) 33-50
The book of Revelation is generally considered to contain a lot of grammatical mistakes. This article suggests that these grammatical inconsistencies are a feature of John’s own hermeneutical agenda. There is an explanation of how John directed his reader towards his evolutionary morphosyntax and a list of various kinds of anacolutha are provided.
Iwan M. Whiteley
40
and the seven stars. The lampstands are ambiguous for two reasons; first
it is unclear if the lampstands are lit; λυχνία focuses on the lampstand
and it is only when the verb καίω35, or the noun λαμπάς36 is utilized
does it become evident that there is a flame present. This can be seen
in 4:5, where John makes it very clear about the lamps in this context;
‘ἑπτὰ. λαμπάδες πυÏὸς καιόμεναι’. The second ambiguity arises as to
why seven lampstands are mentioned. Wilcock says that we are ‘told im-
mediately’37 that the lampstands represent the churches. However, there
are approximately 180 words (about 1 minute reading time) between the
metaphor (1:13) and the explanation (1:20), 180 words where the hearers
do not know the significance of the lampstands. The churches are able
to hypothesize that the seven lampstands are referring to them. Seven
churches were introduced in 1:4 and seven Spirits were also introduced
here, informing the reader that the text will associate the number seven
with the churches. The logical conclusion is that there are seven lamp-
stands to represent each church in each of their communities. This propo-
sition would be satisfactory if the lampstands were lit, but the fact that
the lampstands may not be lit places the churches in an uneasy position.
Consequently, although the lampstand imagery appears to point in their
direction, yet the potential accusation of being lightless and the lack of
article keep the reader in perceiving the text to be unclear.
There is also ambiguity when trying to identify the referent of the
seven stars, 1:16. Commentators automatically turn to 1:20 and therefore
assume that the stars do not refer to the churches, leading them into
speculation as to their significance. Some believe that they are referring
to a specific constellation in the heavens.38 Swete and Charles argue that
no specific constellation was referred to because of the lack of article39.
Boring saw Jesus holding the stars as an anti-astrological sign in that
Jesus was in control of them40. 1 Enoch uses stars to symbolize angels.41
However, if the reader does not read ahead, but takes John’s words in
light of what precedes, then the stars could refer to the churches, based
upon Daniel 12:3 and the choice of the number seven suggests this. At
this stage of reading the text, the reader has the problem that John has
Matthew 5:15, Luke 12:35, John 5:35.
35
Zechariah 4:2, Matthew 25:1-8.
36
M. Wilcock, I Saw Heaven Opened: The Message of Revelation (BST; Leicester 1975)
37
41.
David Chilton, The Days of Vengeance: An Exposition of the Book of Revelation
38
(Fort Worth 1987) 75; P. Carrington, The Meaning of the Revelation (London 1931) 86;
Aune, Revelation, 97.
Swete, The Apocalypse, 18; Charles, A Critical, vol. I, 30.
39
M. Boring, Revelation (Louisville 1989) 84.
40
1 Enoch 21:3, 81, 86:1-3, 88:1, 90:20-25.
41