180 Antonio Piñero logia that can be considered as riddles. He discusses questions of literary genre and considers diverse kinds of riddles: dramatic (Jn 6:5; 11:11), mission (“:4b; 2:16), ‘neck’ riddles (4:20; 7:23), etc. 48. WATT, J.P. van der, “Die gebruik van die metaforen in Psalm 80 (79- LXX) in vergelijking met Johannes 15:1-8”, SkrifK 20 (1999) 455-464. This art. compares the use of metaphor in both texts against the background of metaphor’s theory in the Antiquity. The conclusion is that both texts show the same dynamic in the use of metaphors. 49. YOUNG, G.W., Subversive Symmetry. Exploring the Fantastic in Mark 6:45-56 (Biblical Interpretation 41). Leiden (Brill) 1999, X + 200 pp. The a. contends that historical-critical approaches lack the terminology and conceptual categories necessary to provide an adequate elucidation of this text. Then he establishes that Mk 6:45-56 is a product of the narrative art and offers an introduc- tion to fantasy and fantastic as literary genre, and examines this Markan text as an illustration of a fantastic discourse. It presents also a rhetoric analysis of the dimensions of the passage. The subversive symmetry in this text consists of a conflicting system of perspectives between the disciples, Jesus and the narrator. 50. ZUMSTEIN, J., “Die johanneische Ostergeschichte als Erzählung gele- sen”, ZNT 3 (1999) 11-19. This art. is a narrative analysis. It discusses the plot, the characters, the narrator’s commentaries and the implicit author and reader. 51. ZUMSTEIN, J., Kreative Erinnerung. Relecture im Johannesevangelium. Zürich (Pano) 1999, VII + 237 pp. This book is a collection of art. published between 1989 and 1999. The a. makes wide use of recent developments in literary sciences (specially narratology) in order to clarify the Gospel narrative. See book review by G. van Belle in ETL 76 (2000) 492-493. RHETORIC 52. GRAVES, M., “Preaching Lukan Parables: A Socio-Rhetorical Ap- proach”, SWJT 40 (1997) 17-32. This art. deals with three ques- tions: What is the text saying? (the role of culture); What is the text doing? (the rhetorical function), and the practical conclusion: How can a sermon say and do the same (strategies for preach- ing). 53. JERVIS, L.A., “Galatians 3:19-25 as an Argument for God’s Faithful- ness: Reading Paul’s Rhetoric in Light of his Strategy”, WordW