182 Antonio Piñero SEMANTICS 60. MANZI, F., “‘La fine dei secoli’ e la salvezza mediata ‘una volta per tutte’ nell’epistola agli Ebrei”, ScuolC 128 (2000) 51-115. This long exegetical art. first surveys the semantic field of ‘time’ and ‘salvation’ in Heb. SEMIOTICS See in general the review Sémiotique et Bible (Lyon). 61. GIBERT, P., “Lecture savante et innocente: le récit en lui-même”, Lu- mièreV 248 (2000) 49-56. “Les dérives de la méthode historico- critique ont ouvert la possibilité d’un autre type d’investigation du texte. Les méthodes sémiotiques font abstraction de son mode de production et de son environnement. Se forçant à n’entendre que le texte, elles le restituent à son originalité interrogative, elles risquent toutefois de l’arracher à son historicité, nécessaire à la bonne écoute de son sens, en le lisant comme s’il n’avait aucune origine”. SEMITISMS 62. LOBA MKOLE, J.C., “Une synthèse d’opinions philologiques sur le Fils de l’homme”, JNWS 22 (1996) 107-123. This art. argues that the expression ‘Son of Man’ is an idiomatic syntagm of Aramaic origin, and that it can have a triple meaning (generic, indefinite, circumloquial). It refers to a human being and it is not a mes- sianic title. STRUCTURES See in general the review Linguistica Biblica (Bonn). 63. MERWE, D.J. van der, “The Protection Believers Can Expect from God in the Fulfilment of their Mission”, SkrifK 21 (2000) 135-155. This art. is a structural analysis of Jn 17:9-16. It observes that the whole theological structure is determined by contrasts and parallelisms around the concept of ‘protection’. 64. SURBURG, M.P., “Structural and Lexical Features in 1 Corinthians 11:27-32”, ConcordJ 26 (2000) 200-217. This art. offers a detailed analysis of this text: setting, structure, lexical features. All these indicate that this text does not diminish the sacramental empha- sis of 11:27-32.