Paul Danove, «A Comparison Of The Usage Of Akouw And Akouw- Compounds In The Septuagint And New Testament», Vol. 14 (2001) 65-86
This study characterizes all occurrences of
a0kou/w and seven related verbs (a0ntakou/w,
diakou/w, ei0sakou/w,
e0nakou/w, e0pakou/w,
parakou/w, and u9pakou/w)
in the Septuagint and New Testament according to their semantic and
syntactic properties, develops a single set of rules to describe the
distribution of noun phrase objects of these verbs, and then compares the
patterns of usage of these verbs in the Septuagint and New Testament. A
preliminary discussion identifies the semantic and syntactic properties
necessary to describe all biblical occurrences of
a0kou/w and proposes a set of descriptive rules that govern the
syntactic case of its noun phrase objects. Further investigation then
indicates that this same set of rules with only one minor modification
also is adequate to describe the syntactic case of noun phrase objects of
the noted a0kou/w-compounds. The discussion
concludes by comparing the distribution of noun phrase objects in
particular syntactic cases within the Septuagint and New Testament.
A Comparison of the Usage of ajkouvw and ajkouvw-Compounds 67
1. direct: anqæ w|n o{sa ejn th'/ skotiva/ ei[pate ejn tw'/ fwti; ajkousqhvsetai
j
therefore whatever you said in the dark will be heard in the light
(Luke 12:3a).
2. indirect: ek tou' aijw'no~ oujk hjkouvsqh o{ti hjnevwxevn ti~ ojfqalmou;~
j
tuflou' gegennhmevnou
that anyone opened [the] eyes of one born blind was never heard
(John 9:32).
These modes of perception yield two distinct constructions in the pas-
sive voice:
direct perception indirect perception
Explanation
akouw
jv akouw
jv
syntactic 1 [2] || 1 = sub., 2 = sec. argu., () = indef. null comp. || 1 (2)
semantic Con Exp || Con(tent), Top(ic), Exp(eriencer) || Top Exp
lexical N/V+ P || N = noun phrase, V+ = clause, P = prep. phrase || N/V+ N
These representations recognize that the subject, ‘1,’ of ajkouvw in the
passive voice is realized by a noun phrase or clause or is indicated by the
verbal ending and that the second argument, ‘2,’ is realized by either a
noun phrase (only in 2 Esdr 16:1) or a prepositional phrase (only in 1
Macc 14:43). The parentheses, (), indicate that the second argument may
be indefinite and null, that is, omitted (null) even without a definite con-
textual indication of the nature of the experiencer (indefinite). In such
cases the general connotation, «someone» or «anyone,» must be supplied.
Under certain circumstances, objects denoting speakers (that is, a
human being, God, or another being attributed with speech) receive dif-
ferent syntactic (case) realization than those denoting non-speakers.
Within the analysis, objects designating speakers are deemed to be char-
acterized by the semantic feature, «+ speaker,» and all other objects by the
feature, «– speaker.»
1.2. Indirect Perception (Topic Construction) [265 occurrences]
1.2.1. Noun Phrase Objects [56 occurrences]
Noun phrase objects of the topic construction consistently utilize the
accusative case 4:
4
Object noun phrases (active, indirect): Exod 2:15; 18:1; Num 30:5, 6; Deut 4:6;
1 Sam 2:23; 3:11; 2 Sam 13:21; 1 Kgs 3:28; 8:42; 10:1; 2 Chr 9:1; Esth 1:18; Jdt 4:1;
11:8, 9; Tob 14:15; 1 Macc 8:12; 10:15, 22, 88; 2 Macc 11:24; 14:15; 3 Macc 4:12; Ps
131:6; Job 2:11; Wis 11:13; Isa 16:6; 33:15; 48:7; 66:19; Jer 26:12; 40:9; 43:3; 48:11;
Matt 11:2; 24:6; Mark 13:7; Luke 9:7; 21:9; Acts 5:11b; 7:12; 17:32a; 23:16; 28:15;
Gal 1:13; Eph 1:15; 3:2; 4:21; Phil 1:27; Col 1:4; 2 Thess 3:11; Phlm 5; Jas 5:11; 1 Jn
4:3; 3 Jn 4. The case of the subject depends on its function in its own verb phrase.