Debbie Hunn, «Pleasing God or Pleasing People? Defending the Gospel in Galatians 1–2», Vol. 91 (2010) 24-49
Scholars agree that in Gal 1,13–2,21 Paul substantiates his gospel but disagree as to his method. The three common views: that Paul defends his apostolate, that he denies accusations, and that he functions as a paradigm conflict with the text. Instead, Paul sets up two categories in 1,10 — that of seeking to please people and that of seeking to please God — and defends his gospel by means of his Damascus experience together with his subsequent life motivation.
34 DEBBIE HUNN
gospel produces change in character. He, in fact, breaks any intrinsic
connection between himself and the gospel in 1,8 when he speaks
against anyone — himself included — who preaches another gospel.
IV. Paul’s Defense of the Gospel
Each view just critiqued has merit: Paul was an apostle, he was
at times falsely accused, and his readers should follow his example
where possible. However, none succeeds in fulfilling Paul’s stated
purpose in 1,6-12 of verifying his gospel. To follow the argument
in 1,13–2,21, we return to 1,6-12.
1. The Travelogue: Galatians 1,13-24 in Light of 1,6-12
In 1,6-9 Paul urges the Galatians to return to the gospel he
taught them. He then claims in vv. 11-12 that he did not receive this
gospel from human beings but through a revelation of Jesus Christ.
Both Paul’s introduction to the divine origin of his gospel in v. 11,
gnwrızw gar ymËœn “ for I make known to youâ€, and his rebuke of
¥ ù Ωı
the Galatians in vv. 6-7 necessitate that he prove this claim.
a) Paul’s Argument
Paul begins his proof in v. 13, but how vv. 13-24 verify Paul’s
gospel is not immediately obvious. He is not demonstrating, for
example, a lack of opportunity to receive the gospel from human
beings. Fifteen days with Peter, his years with Barnabas, and even
his passing acquaintance with James would allow him multiple
opportunities. The passage does indicate Paul’s independence from
Jerusalem, although as Lyons noted (above), chap. 2 works against
independence as Paul’s point. However, the distance Paul kept from
the apostles also illustrates that he did not seek to mingle with them
with an eye to prominence among them, and this answers his
question in v. 10 : “Do I now seek to please people or God?†It is my
contention that Paul argues for the divine origin of his gospel on the
basis that he has sought to please God, not human beings, after his
conversion. Exegetes generally understand that Paul makes this
claim in v. 10, but they have not recognized its critical role in his
defense of the gospel from 1,10–2,21.
To see this, we first need to understand v. 10 and its relationship
to vv. 11-12. Paul begins v. 10 with two questions: “For do I now