Debbie Hunn, «Pleasing God or Pleasing People? Defending the Gospel in Galatians 1–2», Vol. 91 (2010) 24-49
Scholars agree that in Gal 1,13–2,21 Paul substantiates his gospel but disagree as to his method. The three common views: that Paul defends his apostolate, that he denies accusations, and that he functions as a paradigm conflict with the text. Instead, Paul sets up two categories in 1,10 — that of seeking to please people and that of seeking to please God — and defends his gospel by means of his Damascus experience together with his subsequent life motivation.
27
PLEASING GOD PLEASING PEOPLE ?
OR
II. View 2: Paul’s Defense against Accusations
The viewpoint that Paul defends himself against accusations is
not a single, unified view but a set of viewpoints encompassing
charges of many kinds. The previous view overlaps with it in that
many who hold that Paul defends his apostolate hold that he defends
it against accusations. But others who read accusations behind the
text find them to target more (or other) than Paul’s apostolic
credentials. The accusations take many forms. David Dockery sees
Paul answering the accusation that his apostleship is derived and
dependent whereas Franz Mußner sees the accusation that Paul’s is
not a true apostolate at all 7. James Dunn says that in 1,17 Paul
responds to a report that he received the gospel from the Jerusalem
apostles, and J.L. Martyn adds that stories circulated that Paul
“ r e c e i ve d supplemental instruction from ‘the disciples in
Damascus’ †8. Dieter Lührmann reads even in Paul’s oath (1,20)
false rumors about his visit with Peter 9. Scholars distill such charges
from the text by mirror reading, that is, by reading a statement Paul
makes as the denial of a charge made against him. Or, as George
Lyons puts it, “The designation ‘mirror reading’ arises from the
presumption that what Paul denies, his opponents have asserted
and/or that what he asserts, they have denied†10.
The problem with mirror reading in general is that a given
response may be provoked by more than one cause. For example,
Paul’s statement in 1,10 that he does not still please people might be
a response to a charge that he does; or it might be a veiled charge
that his opponents do, an indirect warning to his readers against
doing so, or evidence that his gospel is true because only pleasing
people would motivate him to lie. The reflection in the mirror
changes as the mirror is turned. Therefore mirror reading, by
D.S. DOCKERY, “Introduction to the Epistle and Paul’s Defense of his
7
Apostleship (Galatians 1:1–2:14)â€, RevExp 91 (1994) 149. See also DUNN,
Galatians, 67. F. MUßNER, Der Galaterbrief (HTKNT 9; Freiburg 51988) 62.
DUNN, Galatians, 68; J.L. MARTYN, Galatians. A New Translation with
8
Introduction and Commentary (AB 33A; New York, NY 1997) 159.
D. LÃœHRMANN, Galatians. A Continental Commentary (Minneapolis,
9
MN 1992) 33. See also MARTYN, Galatians, 174; M. SILVA, Interpreting
Galatians. Explorations in Exegetical Method (Grand Rapids, MI 22001) 105.
G. LYONS, Pauline Autobiography. Toward a New Understanding
10
(SBLDS 73 ; Atlanta, GA 1985) 80-81.