Matthew Oseka, «Luther’s Textual Study of the Greek New Testament.», Vol. 26 (2013) 49-60
The present paper explores Luther’s textual study of the Greek New Testament which is reconstructed from his approach to Galatians 1,6; 2,5 and 1 John 5,7-8 with reference to the eminent scholars of the 16th century (Laurentius Valla, Jacobus Faber Stapulensis and Erasmus) whose commentaries he consulted.
52 Matthew Oseka
by the Vulgate and by Eastern church fathers but which is omitted in
D* (5th-6th century) and in the pre-Jeromian Latin translations termed
collectively as Vetus Latina or Itala (exactly in codices “b”18 and “d”19).
Besides, certain Western church fathers (cf. Irenaeus20, Tertullian21, Gaius
Marius Victorinus22 and Ambrosiaster23) omitted οὐδὲ, while Jerome24,
Primasius of Hadrumetum25 and Claudius of Turin26 notified of some
Latin manuscripts without οὐδὲ27. The said conjunction is present both
in Erasmus’ Greek New Testament and in the Polyglot.
Luther recalled Jerome’s statement that the Greek text of Galatians 2,5
has οὐδὲ, whereas the old Latin translations are devoid thereof. Whether
the negative conjunction is present or absent determines a meaning of
the passage which the Wittenberg Reformer captured. Luther argued
that Galatians 2,3-4 naturally leads to the conclusion that Paul and Titus
did not surrender to false brothers even for a moment. By virtue of the
authority of the original text and in light of the context Luther defended
οὐδὲ. This very topic was also discussed by the eminent commentators of
the 16th century (cf. Laurentius Valla28, Jacobus Faber Stapulensis29 and
Erasmus30).
18
No. 89, Budapest, 8th-9th century.
19
No. 75, Paris, 5th-6th century.
20
Irenaeus, Adversus haereses, vol. 2, ed. William Wigan Harvey (Cambridge: Typis
academicis, 1857), 74 [III, XIII, 3]. Ibidem, 74 (n. 1).
21
Tertullianus, “Adversus Marcionem,” in Opera, vol. III/1, ed. Ernst Friedrich Leopold
(Leipzig: Tauchnitz, 1841), 260 [V, 3].
22
Marius Victorinus, “In Epistolam Pauli ad Galatas,” in Patrologiae cursus completus:
Series Latina, vol. 8, ed. J.-P. Migne (Paris: J.-P. Migne, 1844), 1158 [Galatians 2,5].
23
Ambrosiaster, “In Epistolam beati Pauli ad Galatas,” in Patrologiae cursus completus:
Series Latina, vol. 17, ed. J.-P. Migne (Paris: J.-P. Migne, 1845), 347 [Galatians 2,5].
24
Hieronymus Stridonensis, “Commentaria in Epistolam ad Galatas,” in Patrologiae
cursus completus: Series Latina, vol. 26, ed. J.-P. Migne (Paris: J.-P. Migne, 1845), 333-335
[Galatians 2,5].
25
Primasius Adrumetanus, “Epistola B. Pauli Apostoli ad Galatas,” in Patrologiae
cursus completus: Series Latina, vol. 68, ed. J.-P. Migne (Paris: J.-P. Migne, 1866), 587
[Galatians 2,5].
26
Claudius Taurinensis, “Enarratio in Epistolam D. Pauli ad Galatas,” in Patrologiae
cursus completus: Series Latina, vol. 104, ed. J.-P. Migne (Paris: J.-P. Migne, 1864), 856-857
[Galatians 2,5].
27
Bruce Manning Metzger, A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament
(Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 2000), 522-523 [Galatians 2,5].
28
Laurentius Valla, In Novum Testamentum annotationes (Basel: Cratander, 1526), 268
[Galatians 2,5].
29
Jacobus Faber Stapulensis, Epistolae divi Pauli apostoli cum commentariis (Paris:
Regnault, 1517), CXXIIv [Galatians 2,5].
30
Erasmus Roterodamus, In Novum Testamentum annotationes (Basel: Froben, 1527),
509 [Galatians 2,5].