Boletín de Filología Neotestamentaria 175 Papathomas) of Heb 3:4b, θεὸς κατασκευάσας πάντα(ς) based on the reading of P. Vindob. G 42417, and concludes that this varia lectio was already known, and that it is necessary to wait until the complete publication of the papyrus is made for a whole discussion of the variants. 20. TOV, E., The Text-Critical Use of the Septuagint in Biblical Research (Jerusalem Biblical Studies 8). Jerusalem (Simor) XXXV + 289 pp. This is a revised and enlarged edition of a work first published in 1982 dealing with assessing the textual variant readings found in the LXX. This book serves as a guide through the problems of using the LXX for textual criticism, especially of the OT. See book review by J.K. Elliott in NT 42 (2000) 306. 21. VIVIANO, B.T., “The Least in the Kingdom: Matthew 11:11, Its Parallel in Luke 7:28 (Q) and Daniel 4:14”, CBQ 62 (2000) 41-54. The a. reconstructs the Q form (included the consideration of the Gospel of Thomas) as follows: “I tell you, among those born of women none is greater than John; yet the least in the kingdom is greater than he”. The most proximate OT’s influence is Dn 4:14. 22. WOJCIECHOWSKI, M., “Tajemna Ewangelia Marka z list Klemensa Alenksandrii do Teodora”, STWsz 37 (1999) 41-52. “This art. contains an introduction, a translation of the letter into Polish and notes. The letter with fragments from the Secret Gospel of Mark stems most probably from Clement of Alexandria. These fragments imitate the style of Mark and they were added to the Gospel in the early II century, they borrow also from Luke… the main story is derived from an early tradition parallel to Jn 11:1- 44”. LITERARY STUDIES AND CRITICISM See in general the review Literature and Theology (Oxford) 23. ALEXANDER, L., “Formal Elements and Genre: Which Greco-Roman Prologues Most Closely Parallel the Lukan Prologues”, in D.P. Moessner (ed.), Jesus and the Heritage of Israel. Luke’s Narrative Claim upon Israel’s Legacy. Harrisburg (Trinity) 1999, 9-26. 24. BARR, D.L., Tales of the End. A Narrative Commentary on the Book of Revelation. Santa Rosa (Polebridge) 1998, XII + 228 pp. In this commentary the a. is especially concerned with literary questions such as how the stories are told, whom they are about, etc. So he considers Rev as a story and examines its genre, symbols, and the significance of this kind of story, etc.