Bradley C. Gregory, «Vice and Virtue in the Moral Vision of the Latin of Sirach.», Vol. 97 (2016) 41-61
Beginning in the Second Temple period some Jewish literature begins to reflect an increased influence from Hellenistic conceptions of virtue and vice. This paper analyzes the expansions and alterations found in the Latin version of Ben Sira to show how the vices of pride, desire, and avarice are elevated in importance and integrated into the larger contours of the moral theology of the book. Their content, amount, and distribution suggest that their piecemeal production arose from attempts to integrate the virtue/vice thinking prominent in late antiquity into the teaching already found in the Book of Sirach.
ViCe AnD VirTue 57
to the poor that your blessing may be accomplished” (7,32 [36]). To
the dependent clause the Latin adds the idea of atonement: “that your
expiation and blessing may be accomplished” (ut perficiatur propitia-
tio et benedictio tua) 65. This addition aligns this verse with Ben Sira’s
own conviction that generosity can atone for sin (3,14-15 [15-17].30
[33]; 35,1-5). The benefits of generosity are likewise emphasized in
12,2 within another passage on generosity (12,1-6). The Greek reads,
“Do good to the godly and you will find repayment, if not from him
then (avlla,) from the most High”. The Latin however, modifies “re-
payment” with “great” (retributionem magnam) and emphasizes the
certainty of repayment by translating avlla, with certe: “if not from
him, assuredly from the Lord” (si non ab ipso certe a domino) 66.
These two changes reinforce the benefits of generosity through an
elaboration of the extent and reliability of its reward.
in sum, the Latin version builds upon the idea in Grii that avarice
is the most serious sin and does significant damage to one’s own soul.
Greed is correlated both with miserliness and with arrogant imperial
aggressiveness. in order to dissuade the reader from avarice, the Latin
version reminds the reader of the coming judgment in order to dimin-
ish the appeal of accumulated wealth. it also repeatedly encourages
generosity by accenting its obligation, its desirability, and its rewards.
V. Other Vices: envy, Anger, Sloth
Some virtues and vices that were common in late antique discus-
sions of ethics play a lesser role in the Latin version. While envy,
anger, and sloth do appear in the book, they are rather ad hoc and not
major themes like the other three vices.
The vice of envy appears in a Grii addition at 20,14 where the
envious person who gives under obligation is placed in parallel with
the fool who gives but is looking for a sevenfold payback 67. While
the Latin does not contain this addition, it does include additional
references to envy in a few places 68. in 9,11 (16), the Greek warns the
65
So also D. See THieLe, Sirach, 325.
66
So also D. See THieLe, Sirach, 402.
67
This addition appears in the Lucianic recension and ms 672. See BuSSinO,
Greek Additions, 314-318.
68
it is noteworthy that in the discussion of miserliness in 14,3-10 the Latin ren-
ders the idiom for a miser, “the evil eye”, by retaining the construction of the idiom
but making explicit the element of envy: oculus lividi (14,8; cf. 14,3). in the next