Nadav Na’aman, «Jebusites and Jabeshites in the Saul and David Story-Cycles», Vol. 95 (2014) 481-497
This article re-examines the historical role of the Jebusites in the early monarchical period. The Jebusites, whose name is derived from the verb YBŚ («to be dry»), were a West Semitic pastoral clan that split into two segments, one settling in western Gilead and the other around Jerusalem. The two segments kept their tribal solidarity, as indicated by Saul’s campaign to rescue Jabesh-gilead. The Jebusite stronghold was one of Saul’s power bases, and David took it over. The biased description of David’s conquest influenced the way the Jebusites were presented in the late (Deuteronomistic) biblical historiography and in Israelite cultural memory.
001_naman_co_481-497 13/02/15 11:20 Pagina 489
JEBUSITES AND JABESHITES IN THE SAUL AND DAVID STORY-CYCLES 489
Nathan 38, and Uriah 39. However, none of these identifications is
supported by concrete evidence. Theoretically, persons who are
mentioned in these story-cycles might have been of Jebusite origin,
but since there is no way to corroborate this origin, we should best
avoid such identifications.
The discussion of the Hittites in the court of David and the Hit-
tite influence on the cult and culture of Jerusalem should be set
apart from that of the Jebusites. We know very little of Jerusalem
in the pre-monarchical and early monarchical period, and it is im-
possible to establish with certainty the role of Hittites in the history
of the kingdom and the city 40.
In sum, the account of David’s conquest of Jerusalem supplies
only few details about the Jebusites. They must have controlled the
stronghold and its region and, following David’s conquest, re-
mained in the area and were gradually absorbed within the growing
population of Jerusalem and the nearby region.
III. Saul’s Residence at Gibeah (Tell el-Fûl)
Saul established his residence at Gibeah/Gibeah of Saul (Tell
el-Fûl), about 11 kilometres north of ancient Jerusalem, and was
buried in Zela (2 Sam 21,14), a place located in the Jerusalem re-
gion (see Josh 18,28). The identification of Gibeah/Gibeah of Saul
at Tell el-Fûl was suggested at the dawn of biblical research 41. Fol-
38
G.W. AHLSTRÖM, “Der Prophet Nathan und der Tempelbau”, VT 11
(1961) 113-127; G. HENTSCHEL, “War Natan der Wortführer der Jebusiter?”,
Ich bewirke das Heil und erschaffe das Unheil (Jesaja 45,7). Studien zur
Botschaft der Propheten. Festschrift für Lothar Ruppert zum 65. Geburtstag
(eds. F. DIETRICH – B. WILLMES) (FB 88; Würzburg 1998) 181-208, with ear-
lier literature.
39
For the origin and etymologies proposed for the name Uriah, see
SINGER, “The Hittites and the Bible”, 744-745, with earlier literature; M. GER-
HARDS, “Die biblischen ‘Hethiter’”, 164-167.
40
For recent discussions on this topic, see SINGER, “The Hittites and the
Bible”, 723-756; GERHARDS, “Die biblischen ‘Hethiter’”, 145-179; NA’AMAN,
“Queen Mothers”, 479-490, with earlier literature.
41
E. ROBINSON, “Notes on Biblical Geography”, Bibliotheca Sacra and
Theological Review 1 (1844) 598-602.