Nadav Na’aman, «Jebusites and Jabeshites in the Saul and David Story-Cycles», Vol. 95 (2014) 481-497
This article re-examines the historical role of the Jebusites in the early monarchical period. The Jebusites, whose name is derived from the verb YBŚ («to be dry»), were a West Semitic pastoral clan that split into two segments, one settling in western Gilead and the other around Jerusalem. The two segments kept their tribal solidarity, as indicated by Saul’s campaign to rescue Jabesh-gilead. The Jebusite stronghold was one of Saul’s power bases, and David took it over. The biased description of David’s conquest influenced the way the Jebusites were presented in the late (Deuteronomistic) biblical historiography and in Israelite cultural memory.
001_naman_481-497 19/02/15 10:43 Pagina 491
JEBUSITES AND JABESHITES IN THE SAUL AND DAVID STORY-CYCLES 491
led to Jerusalem and did not turn east toward Jeba‛. Josephus sup-
ports the identification of Gabath-Saul with Tell el-Fûl with two
other pieces of evidence. (a) In Antiquities (VIII 303), he relates
that Ramah was distanced 40 stadia from Jerusalem. Since Jeba‛ is
farther from Jerusalem than Ramah is, the statement that Gabath-
Saul is located 30 stadia from Jerusalem cannot refer to Jeba‛ 46.
(b) In his description of the Outrage of Gibeah, Josephus (Antiqui-
ties V 139-140) relates that the Levite, after arriving near Jerusalem,
decided to proceed a distance of 20 stadia and lodge in an Israelite
town, that is, Gibeah. Evidently, in his two works, Josephus
recorded approximate measures — 30 and 20 stadia — for the dis-
tance between Jerusalem and Gibeah/Gabath-Saul. An average span
of about 25 stadia corresponds exactly with the distance from
Jerusalem to Tell el-Fûl, but certainly not to far-off Jeba‛ 47.
4. In Jerome’s description of Paula’s pilgrimage to Jerusalem,
he relates that she passed Aijalon and Gibeon, stopped briefly at
“Gabaa” and proceeded to Jerusalem while passing near the mau-
soleum of Helena. Even scholars who identified Gibeah at Jeba‛
admit that Jerome’s Gabaa refers to Tell el-Fûl 48. This identification
is also applied to the other sites named Gabaa that Jerome mentions
in his commentaries on Hos 5,8 and Zeph 1,15-16 49.
5. The confusion in identification of Geba‛ and Gibeah is mainly
confined to the episode of Saul’s war with the Philistines (1 Samuel
13–14), which is beyond the scope of this article. In all other ref-
erences within the story-cycle of Saul, the place is called either
Gibeah of Saul (1 Sam 11,4; 15,34) or Gibeah (1 Sam 10,26; 22,6;
23,19; 26,1) and refers to Saul’s place of birth and his residence as
king. Its identification with Tell el-Fûl is self-evident 50.
46
ROBINSON (“Notes”, 600) has already suggested this proposition.
47
ROBINSON, “Notes”, 600-601. For further discussion, see C. MÖLLER –
G. SCHMITT, Siedlungen Palästinas nach Flavius Josephus (BTAVO, Reihe
B [Geisteswissenschaften] Nr. 14; Wiesbaden 1976) 55, with earlier literature;
E. REGEV, “Josephus on Gibeah: Versions of a Toponym”, JQR 89 (1999)
352-353.
48
MILLER, “Geba/Gibeah”, 162.
49
For references, see Y. TSAFRIR – L. DI SEGNI – J. GREEN, Tabula Imperii
Romani — Maps and Gazetteer. Eretz Israel in the Hellenistic, Roman and
Byzantine Periods (Jerusalem 1994) 126a.
50
The location of Gibeath Elohim (1 Sam 10,5.10) is not clear and de-
pends on the authenticity of the LXX of v. 13 (MT “he came to the high place
[hmb]; LXX “to Gibeah”). I therefore exclude it from the discussion.