Nadav Na’aman, «Jebusites and Jabeshites in the Saul and David Story-Cycles», Vol. 95 (2014) 481-497
This article re-examines the historical role of the Jebusites in the early monarchical period. The Jebusites, whose name is derived from the verb YBŚ («to be dry»), were a West Semitic pastoral clan that split into two segments, one settling in western Gilead and the other around Jerusalem. The two segments kept their tribal solidarity, as indicated by Saul’s campaign to rescue Jabesh-gilead. The Jebusite stronghold was one of Saul’s power bases, and David took it over. The biased description of David’s conquest influenced the way the Jebusites were presented in the late (Deuteronomistic) biblical historiography and in Israelite cultural memory.
001_naman_co_481-497 13/02/15 11:20 Pagina 490
490 NADAV NA’AMAN
lowing the excavations held at the site 42, the majority of scholars
accepted its identification with Gibeah 43.
However, some scholars posit that biblical Gibeah/Gibeah of Saul
and Geba are alternative names of one place that is located at Jeba‛,
in the eastern Benjamin hill country 44. They thus dismissed the iden-
tification of the former with Tel el-Fûl. In my opinion, this suggestion
is wholly erroneous, resting on (a) a misreading of the text of Isa
10,29; (b) a misrepresentation of the data of Josephus; and (c) un-
likely interpretations of the biblical references to Gibeah 45.
1. According to Isa 10,29 (“They crossed through the ravine;
‘Geba‛ is our lodge for the night’; Ramah trembled, Gibeah of Saul
has fled”), Geba and Gibeah of Saul were two different places on
the road leading from the north to Jerusalem.
2. The confusion of Gibeah and Geba in Judges 19–20 results
from the late expansions inserted into the story, but the original
story in chapter 19 identified Gibeah at Tell el-Fûl. This identifica-
tion is suggested by the account of the march from Bethlehem to
Gibeah. The Levite proceeded from Bethlehem around the evening
(v. 9), arrived near Jerusalem (Jebus) when the day was mostly
gone (v. 11), and when the sun went down arrived at Gibeah (v.
14). Jeba‛ is located far off from Jerusalem; only the nearby Tell
el-Fûl fits the account’s time-table.
3. In his account of Titus’ march toward Jerusalem, Josephus
(Wars, V 50-51) relates that the Roman army proceeded from
Samaria and spent the night at Gophna (Jifnâ). After a second day’s
march, the army camped at a place called “the Valley of Thorns”,
near Gabath-Saul, about 30 stadia from Jerusalem. Clearly, the
Roman army proceeded along the central highland’s main road that
42
For the excavations of the site, see W.F. ALBRIGHT, Excavation and Re-
sults at Tell el-Fûl (Gibeah of Saul) (AASOR 4; New Haven, CT 1924); L.A.
SINCLAIR, “An Archaeological Study of Gibeah (Tell el-Ful)”, AASOR 34-35
(1960) 1-52; P.W. LAPP, “Tell el-Fûl”, BA 28 (1965) 2-10; N.L. LAPP, “Fûl,
Tell el-”, The New Encyclopedia of Archaeological Excavations in the Holy
Land, vol. 2 (ed. E. STERN) (Jerusalem 1993) 445-448, with earlier literature.
43
See recently, H. HARRIS, “Albright’s Identification of Gibeah with Tell
el-Ful”, PEQ 146 (2014) 17-30, with earlier literature.
44
J.M. MILLER, “Geba/Gibeah of Benjamin”, VT 25 (1979) 145-166; P.M.
ARNOLD, Gibeah: The Search for a Biblical City (JSOTS 79; Sheffield 1990);
I. FINKELSTEIN, “Tell el-Ful Revisited: The Assyrian and Hellenistic Periods
(with a New Identification)”, PEQ 143 (2011) 106-118.
45
For detailed criticism, see HARRIS, “Albright’s Identification”, 17-30.