Bradley C. Gregory, «Slips of the Tongue in the Speech Ethics of Ben Sira», Vol. 93 (2012) 321-339
This article examines the references to slips of the tongue in the speech ethics of Ben Sira. Against the background of Proverbs, this characterization of accidental speech errors represents a new development. Its origin can be traced to the confluence between sapiential metaphors for mistakes in life and the idea of a slip of the tongue in the Hellenistic world. Ben Sira’s references to slips of the tongue are generally coordinated with a lack of discipline, though at least two verses seem to suggest that slips are not always sinful and that they represent a universal phenomenon, found even among the wisest sages.
01_Biblica_1_F_Gregory_Layout 1 05/11/12 12:13 Pagina 322
322 BRADLEY C. GREGORY
Because of the weighty consequences that can follow from
speech, the sages in Proverbs consistently urge the need for care
and restraint in speaking. For example:
He who keeps watch over his mouth and tongue
keeps himself out of trouble. (21,23)
He who guards his mouth preserves his life;
he who opens wide his lips, ruin is his. (13,3)
The proverb preserved in 13,3 is particularly poignant since it
portrays the ability to restrain one’s speech as a matter of life and
death. Throughout Proverbs there is a consistent correlation be-
tween restrained speech and wisdom, on the one hand, and unre-
strained speech and folly, on the other. The nature of the contrast
in chapters 15 and 10 is significant:
The tongue of the wise makes knowledge pleasant,
but the mouth of fools pours out folly. (15,2)
The mind of the righteous considers how to answer,
but the mouth of the wicked pours out evil. (15,28)
The mouth of the righteous is a spring of life,
but the mouth of the wicked masks violence. (10,11)
With many words, transgression does not cease,
but the sage restrains his lips. (10,19)
The mouth of the righteous bears the fruit of wisdom,
but the tongue of the perverse will be cut off. (10,31)
While the basic contrast in these verses is not particularly sur-
prising, the language used by the sages is revealing, for it suggests
that one’s speech is simply a reflection of one’s inner disposition.
Fools pour out folly whereas the mouth of the righteous is like a
geyser of life, gushing out wisdom. As William Baker observes,
“The mouth of the fool cannot help but gush folly. The opposite is
true of the righteous man who cannot help but spout wisdom†2.
2
W.R. BAKER, Personal Speech-Ethics in the Epistle of James (WUNT
II/68; Tübingen 1995) 109, n. 13.