Hans Ausloos - Valérie Kabergs, «Paronomasia or Wordplay? A Babel-Like Confusion. Towards a Definition of Hebrew Wordplay», Vol. 93 (2012) 1-20
Against the general background of a terminological confusion that is present in contributions about Hebrew wordplay, the definition of the socalled paronomasia in relation to the term wordplay is especially debated. This article aims to clarify the concept of wordplay in the Hebrew Bible. After a survey of the current opinions in defining the terms «paronomasia» and «wordplay» (I), we propose our own definition of «Hebrew wordplay» (II). Thereafter, this description will simultaneously delimit the field of Hebrew wordplay as it excludes a few linguistic figures, although they are possibly classified as wordplay in other studies (III).
2 VALÉRIE KABERGS – HANS AUSLOOS
nition of Hebrew wordplay is most necessary, as there are as many
definitions and terminological concepts being used to refer to the phe-
nomenon as there are minor studies on wordplay in a particular Bible
passage. The definition of so-called paronomasia in particular is
highly debated in relation to the term “wordplayâ€. After a survey of
the current opinions in defining the concepts of “paronomasia†and
“wordplay†(I), we aim at proposing our own definition of the concept
of “Hebrew wordplay†(II). Thereafter, this description will simulta-
neously delimitate the field of Hebrew wordplay as it excludes a few
linguistic figures that are classified as wordplay in other studies (III).
I. A Terminological Confusion
Casanowicz’s study on wordplay in the Old Testament was inno-
vative in its time and has certainly served as an inspiration for many
Biblical scholars. However, by entitling his study Paronomasia in
the Old Testament, his work has also led to much confusion. In order
to illustrate this terminological chaos, we give a short survey of the
way in which classical rhetoricians, Casanowicz himself, and more
recent Old Testament scholars who based their observations regard-
ing wordplay mostly on Casanowicz’s work have dealt with and de-
fined the concepts of “paronomasia†and “wordplayâ€.
1. The “Classical†Definition of Paronomasia and the Terminology of
Casanowicz
According to Casanowicz’s survey, the term paronomasia is ini-
tially found in Greek-Latin rhetorical literature, where the concept is
catalogued as one of the so-called “figures of words†(sxh/mata th=v
lecewv or figurae verborum) 5. In his Symposium, Plato (428/427–
/
347 B.C.E.) refers by means of the vague term i1sa to instances based
5
Cf. CASANOWICZ, Paronomasia in the Old Testament, 1-4. The great at-
tention to figures of sound in classical literature (just as it is the case for Bib-
lical literature) can be understood against the background of complex
transmission processes. As the written fixation of texts was preceded by an
oral tradition, it is very plausible that authors/redactors paid much attention
to similar sound patterns in order to facilitate the comprehension and memo-
rization of texts.