Hans Ausloos - Valérie Kabergs, «Paronomasia or Wordplay? A Babel-Like Confusion. Towards a Definition of Hebrew Wordplay», Vol. 93 (2012) 1-20
Against the general background of a terminological confusion that is present in contributions about Hebrew wordplay, the definition of the socalled paronomasia in relation to the term wordplay is especially debated. This article aims to clarify the concept of wordplay in the Hebrew Bible. After a survey of the current opinions in defining the terms «paronomasia» and «wordplay» (I), we propose our own definition of «Hebrew wordplay» (II). Thereafter, this description will simultaneously delimit the field of Hebrew wordplay as it excludes a few linguistic figures, although they are possibly classified as wordplay in other studies (III).
5
PARONOMASIA OR WORDPLAY?
Casanowicz probably had the best possible intentions in bring-
ing some unity to several definitions and concepts. However, one
can at least say that he nevertheless simultaneously created a ter-
minological confusion between the general Greek-Latin umbrella
term sxh/mata th=v le/cewv (figurae verborum) and the yet more
specifically defined concept of paronomasia in ancient rhetoric.
Casanowicz confuses two definitions of paronomasia, and in doing
so, he uses the concept as a general denomination for not only
wordplay, but also alliteration, assonance and other kinds of rhyme.
2. Casanowicz and Later Old Testament Studies on Wordplay
The major impact of Casanowicz’ work on Old Testament stud-
ies becomes immediately clear when looking at some titles that
scholars use to characterize their research on (certain types of) He-
brew wordplay, and from the fact that scholars often explicitly refer
to his study 16. While Casanowicz is still somewhat ambiguous in
defining the concept of paronomasia, later Old Testament studies on
wordplay unmistakably identify Casanowicz’s concept of parono-
masia with wordplay tout court. Again, such identification creates
a number of problems in our view.
First, the unambiguous identification of the terms paronomasia
and wordplay is not completely in line with Casanowicz, whose con-
ception of paronomasia is not only related to wordplay, but refers
16
Casanowicz’s title Paronomasia in the Old Testament has clearly influen-
ced the following works: B.J. BEITZEL, “Exodus 3:14 and the Divine Name: A
Case of Biblical Paronomasiaâ€, TJ 1 (1980) 5-20; CHERRY, Paronomasia and
Proper Names in the Old Testament, 1988; D.L. CHRISTENSEN, “Anticipatory
Paronomasia in Jonah 3:7-8 and Genesis 37:2â€, RB 90 (1983) 261-263; J.J.
GLÃœCK, “Paronomasia in Biblical Literatureâ€, Sem 1 (1970) 50-78; A. GUIL-
LAUME, “Paronomasia in the Old Testamentâ€, JSS 9 (1964) 282-296; B. HALPERN
– R.E. FRIEDMAN, “Composition and Paronomasia in the Book of Jonahâ€, HAR
4 (1980) 79-92; I. KALIMI, “Paronomasia in the Book of Chroniclesâ€, JSOT 67
(1995) 27-41; I. KALIMI, “Paronomasie im Buch der Chronik: Ein Beitrag zur li-
terarischen Forschung an der Arbeitsweise des Chronistenâ€, BZ 41 (1997) 78-
88; D. MARCUS, “Recovering an Ancient Paronomasia in Zechariah 14,5â€,
Inspired Speech: Prophecy in the Ancient Near East. Essays in Honor of H.B.
Huffmon (eds. J. KALTNER – L. STULMAN) (JSOT SS 378; London 2004) 130-
143; S. SEGERT, “Paronomasia in the Samson Narrative in Judges XIII-XVIâ€,
VT 34 (1984) 454-461.