Hans Ausloos - Valérie Kabergs, «Paronomasia or Wordplay? A Babel-Like Confusion. Towards a Definition of Hebrew Wordplay», Vol. 93 (2012) 1-20
Against the general background of a terminological confusion that is present in contributions about Hebrew wordplay, the definition of the socalled paronomasia in relation to the term wordplay is especially debated. This article aims to clarify the concept of wordplay in the Hebrew Bible. After a survey of the current opinions in defining the terms «paronomasia» and «wordplay» (I), we propose our own definition of «Hebrew wordplay» (II). Thereafter, this description will simultaneously delimit the field of Hebrew wordplay as it excludes a few linguistic figures, although they are possibly classified as wordplay in other studies (III).
10 VALÉRIE KABERGS – HANS AUSLOOS
tain ambiguity is characteristic for all types of wordplay 25. By means
of the ambiguity which is created by certain word combinations, He-
brew authors/redactors have tried to focus the hearer’s/reader’s atten-
tion on a particular passage. However, this stirring up of curiosity is
never the only purpose. The ambiguity has to point to the deeper mean-
ings and connections between combined words in relation to their lit-
erary context. Wordplay is therefore certainly not a construction that
wants to set its own ambiguity in the spotlight by creating a certain
“witticismâ€. The ambiguity is rather in service of the central message
of the concrete text 26. This creation of ambiguity is moreover not
bound to any particular genre, but is present in the Pentateuch and His-
torical Books as well as in Poetic and Prophetic Literature.
A beautiful example of how wordplay enhances the central mes-
sage of a concrete passage can be found in Judges 3,12-30 27. The
story of Eglon and Ehud appears in a context with deuteronomistic
characteristics. Because of the people’s idolatrous behavior, YHWH
permits Eglon, king of Moab, to take power over Israel. However,
after Israel’s repentance, YHWH is prepared to forgive his people. In
order to save his people from Moab’s suppression, YHWH sends
Ehud on a special mission. This mission is characterized as am-
biguous from the start: whereas it looks like Ehud is on his way to
Eglon with the purpose of paying tribute to the king, Ehud in real-
ity intends to kill the king of Moab in order to save the Israelites.
Several instances of wordplay strengthen this ambiguity. To give
but one example, one could refer to verse 19, in which Ehud speaks
to king Eglon in ambiguous words. Ehud says that he has a secret
rbd for the king. Eglon probably interprets the sentence as “I have
25
Cf., for example, GLÃœCK, Paronomasia in Biblical Literature, 50; SAS-
SON, Wordplay in the Old Testament, 968; CHERRY, Paronomasia and Proper
Names in the Old Testament, 6; WATSON, Classical Hebrew Poetry, 237.
26
Cf. BEITZEL, Exodus 3:14 and the Divine Name, 6.
27
Cf. H. AUSLOOS, “Judges 3:12-30. An Analysis of the Greek Rendering
of Hebrew Wordplayâ€, Text-Critical and Hermeneutical Studies in the Sep-
tuagint (eds. J. COOK – H.-J. STIPP) (VTS; Leiden 2012 [in press]). See also
H. AUSLOOS – B. LEMMELIJN, “Characterizing the LXX Translation of Judges
on the Basis of Content-Related Criteria. The Greek Rendering of Hebrew
Absolute Hapax Legomena in Judg 3,12-30â€, After Qumran. Old and New
Editions of Biblical Texts. The Historical Books (eds. H. AUSLOOS et al.)
(BETL 246; Leuven – Paris – Walpole, MA 2012 [in press]).