Nadav Na’aman, «Biblical and Historical Jerusalem in the Tenth and Fifth-Fourth Centuries BCE», Vol. 93 (2012) 21-42
The article examines the accounts of construction works carried out in Jerusalem in the tenth and fifth-fourth centuries BCE and emphasizes the importance of local oral traditions, the role of biblical texts, and archaeological evidence. It demonstrates that the residence built by David played an important role throughout the First Temple period. The Millo is identified with the Stepped Stone Structure. Solomon possibly founded a modest shrine on the Temple Mount, which later became the main sanctuary of the kingdom. The Ophel was the earlier quarter settled and fortified in Jerusalem after the Babylonian destruction of 587/586.
22 NADAV NA’AMAN
suggest that tenth-century Jerusalem was in fact a small marginal
town3. As the fifth-fourth centuries BCE were also a period of great
decline, there are similar disputes over the scope and population of
the city rebuilt by the Returnees. Thus, for example, some schol-
ars dismiss the historicity of the account of the wall built by Ne-
hemiah and on the basis of the archaeological evidence alone
assign it to the Hellenistic period 4, whereas others suggest that
enough fifth-fourth archaeological evidence exists to substantiate
the biblical description 5.
The date of the archaeological strata and the interpretation of
the evidence unearthed in the excavations of the City of David are
beyond the scope of this article. I focus instead on the way biblical
authors described the building operations carried out in Jerusalem
and the implications of these descriptions for the discussion of the
history of the city. Texts and archaeology should be interpreted in-
dependently of each other and only then be compared. Although
the biblical descriptions of Jerusalem have been discussed many
times in the past, I believe that these discussions do not exhaust the
potential value of the sources.
In what follows, I will first examine the biblical accounts of
building projects carried out in Jerusalem in the time of David and
Solomon and then analyze the construction accounts from the Per-
sian period. Through this discussion, I will attempt to evaluate the
Its Near Eastern Context. A Tribute to Nadav Na’aman (eds. Y. AMIT – E.
BEN ZVI – I. FINKELSTEIN – O. LIPSCHITS) (Winona Lake, IN 2006) 257-265;
O. KEEL, Die Geschichte Jerusalems und die Enstehung des Monotheismus
(Göttingen 2007) I, 122-125; A. FAUST, “The Large Stone Structure in the
City of David: A Reexaminationâ€, ZDPV 126 (2010) 117-122.
3
M. STEINER, “The Evidence from Kenyon’s Excavations in Jerusalem: A Re-
sponse Essayâ€, Jerusalem in Bible and Archaeology. The First Temple Period (eds.
A.G. VAUGHN – A.E. KILLEBREW) (Atlanta, GA 2003) 347-363; D. USSISHKIN,
“Solomon’s Jerusalem: The Text and the Facts on the Groundâ€, Jerusalem in Bible
and Archaeology, 103-115; I. FINKELSTEIN – Z. HERZOG – L. SINGER-AVITZ – D.
USSISHKIN, “Has King David’s Palace Been Foundâ€, Tel Aviv 34 (2007) 142-
164; I. FINKELSTEIN, “The ‘Large Stone Structure’ in Jerusalem: Reality versus
Yearningâ€, ZDPV 127 (2011) 1-11, with earlier literature.
4
I. FINKELSTEIN, “Jerusalem in the Persian (and Early Hellenistic) Period
and the Wall of Nehemiahâ€, JSOT 32 (2008) 501-520; idem, “Persian Period
Jerusalem and Yehud: A Rejoinderâ€, JHS 9 (2009) Article 24.
5
O. LIPSCHITS, “Persian Period Finds from Jerusalem: Facts and Inter-
pretationsâ€, JHS 9 (2009) Article 20; E. MAZAR, “The Wall that Nehemiah
Builtâ€, BAR 35/2 (2009) 24–33, 66; idem, Palace of King David, 72-76.