Nadav Na’aman, «Biblical and Historical Jerusalem in the Tenth and Fifth-Fourth Centuries BCE», Vol. 93 (2012) 21-42
The article examines the accounts of construction works carried out in Jerusalem in the tenth and fifth-fourth centuries BCE and emphasizes the importance of local oral traditions, the role of biblical texts, and archaeological evidence. It demonstrates that the residence built by David played an important role throughout the First Temple period. The Millo is identified with the Stepped Stone Structure. Solomon possibly founded a modest shrine on the Temple Mount, which later became the main sanctuary of the kingdom. The Ophel was the earlier quarter settled and fortified in Jerusalem after the Babylonian destruction of 587/586.
31
BIBLICAL AND HISTORICAL JERUSALEM
David and Solomon are silent about the space between the two for-
tified quarters, a silence indicating that at the time of writing it was
not yet considered a closed and well-defined quarter 24.
Archaeologists observed that in the Iron I-early IIa only the
summit of the City of David was inhabited and fortified by the
Stepped Stone Structure. According to the “modified conventional
chronology†(which I support), the construction of this massive
structure and the Large Stone Structure above it took place in the
third quarter of the tenth century BCE 25. Note that the Book of
Kings does not relate the date of fortification of the City of David
(in its maximal scope). Archaeologically, the fortification has been
dated to the eighth century 26. The date of fortification of the Temple
Mount remains unknown. The area south of the Temple Mount was
built only since the eighth century onward, which explains its absence
from descriptions of pre-exilic Jerusalem 27.
As noted above, accounts of building operations in Jerusalem
might reflect the vivid memory of the city’s inhabitants. The account
that David built a residence in the City of David (2 Sam 5,9) is
strongly supported by the texts of Jeremiah and Nehemiah and might
reflect a tenth-century reality (of course, the residence might have
been expanded and renovated later). I would further suggest that the
claim that Solomon founded the temple on the Temple Mount may
also reflect a local vivid memory. Initially, the temple was a modest
shrine built by the royal dynasty, and it developed gradually, stage
24
Benjamin and Eilat Mazar, who excavated the area south of the Tem-
ple Mount, have observed the gap between the Temple Mount’s southern edge
and the City of David’s northern edge. See E. MAZAR – B. MAZAR, Excava-
tions in the South of the Temple Mount. The Ophel of Biblical Jerusalem
(Qedem 29; Jerusalem 1989) 58.
25
A. MAZAR – C. BRONK RAMSEY, “14C Dates and the Iron Age Chrono-
logy of Israel: A Responseâ€, Radiocarbon 50 (2008) 159-180; A. MAZAR,
“The Iron Age Chronology Debate: Is the Gap Narrowing? Another View-
pointâ€, NEA 74 (2011) 105-111.
26
KENYON, Digging up Jerusalem, 83, 130-131; SHILOH, City of David,
12-13, 28; D.T. ARIEL – A. DE GROOT, “The Iron Age Extramural Occupation
at the City of David and Additional Observations on the Siloam Channelâ€, Ex-
cavations at the City of David 1975-1985 Directed by Yigal Shiloh. V: Ex-
tramural Areas (ed. D.T. ARIEL) (Qedem 40; Jerusalem 2000) 157, 159-163.
27
E. MAZAR – B. MAZAR, South of the Temple Mount, 58-60.