Nadav Na’aman, «Biblical and Historical Jerusalem in the Tenth and Fifth-Fourth Centuries BCE», Vol. 93 (2012) 21-42
The article examines the accounts of construction works carried out in Jerusalem in the tenth and fifth-fourth centuries BCE and emphasizes the importance of local oral traditions, the role of biblical texts, and archaeological evidence. It demonstrates that the residence built by David played an important role throughout the First Temple period. The Millo is identified with the Stepped Stone Structure. Solomon possibly founded a modest shrine on the Temple Mount, which later became the main sanctuary of the kingdom. The Ophel was the earlier quarter settled and fortified in Jerusalem after the Babylonian destruction of 587/586.
33
BIBLICAL AND HISTORICAL JERUSALEM
erected near the shrine and developed gradually over time. Since
the early residence was built in a densely inhabited area which
placed limitations on its growth, the centre was gradually shifted to
the Temple Mount, which became the seat of the royal palace and
the site of the central temple of the kingdom.
The Book of Kings provides no further descriptions of the for-
tification of Jerusalem after the time of David and Solomon. Even
the construction of the ‘Broad Wall’ that surrounded the South-
western Hill in the late eighth century BCE is mentioned nowhere.
The reason is clear: The authors of the story cycles of David and
Solomon attributed to the two kings the construction of the palace
and temple in all their splendor, as well as the fortification of the
Temple Mount and the City of David (in its limited scope). Hence,
later kings were capable only of restoring the magnificent edifices
already constructed, but not of initiating any new building projects.
The picture of building operations in Jerusalem and the Kingdom
of Judah has drastically changed in the Book of Chronicles, but this
work was written hundreds of years later and reflects historio-
graphical concepts of the time of its late author.
IV. Biblical Jerusalem in the Persian Period
I shall open the discussion by comparing the accounts of David’s
building operations in Jerusalem in the books of Samuel and Chron-
icles:
“And he fortified ‘the city’ round about (sÄbîb) from the Millo in-
wards (ÄbayÇtâ)†(2 Sam 5,9).
“And he fortified the city round about (missÄbîb) from the Millo up
to the surrounding wall (‛ad hassÄbîb); and Joab repaired (yehayyeh)
.
the rest of the city†(1 Chr 11,8).
SÄbîb is a hapax legomenon, derived from the noun sbb in the
sense of “surrounding wallâ€. By a play of words with the adverb
(missÄbîb) and noun (hassÄbîb), the Chronicler interpreted the text
of his source, the Book of Samuel. First, he emphasized that David
fortified the area from the Millo “up to the surrounding wallâ€. In my
opinion, this “surrounding wall†(sÄbîb) designated the Ophel wall
located north of the Millo that encompassed the northern quarter