John Granger Cook, «1 Cor 9,5: The Women of the Apostles», Vol. 89 (2008) 352-368
The women of the apostles in 1 Cor 9,5 have posed a riddle in the history of interpretation. With few exceptions commentators over the last one hundred years have identified them as wives and dismissed the text in a few lines. Recent research on the role of women in early Christian mission has brought a fresh assessment, concluding that the women were missionary assistants to the apostles. This essay develops an extended argument to solidify the thesis using the history of interpretation, the nature of missionary partnerships in the Pauline epistles, semantics, some important parallels from the Greco-Roman world, and the nature of ancient households.
358 John Granger Cook
Murphy-O’Connor, using the proverb “eat, drink, and be merryâ€,
attempts to explain Paul’s decision to introduce wives into the
discussion (33). The fact that Paul does not name the wives of the
apostles probably indicates that they had a subordinate role (if any) in
the mission (34).
VII. Partners in Mission in the Pauline Epistles
The literature on the role of women in early Christian mission has
drawn a clear focus on missionary couples such Priscilla and Aquila
(Rom 16, 4; 1 Cor 16,19; Acts 18,2.26). Why has Priscilla, for
example, not been defined as “providing material support†to Aquila in
his work of mission? Here Paul is explicit. He calls them “my fellow
workers in Christ Jesus†(Rom 16,3 tou;" sunergouv" mou ejn Cristw/' -
ΔIhsou') who have risked their necks for him (Rom 16,4). They have a
church in their home (Rom 16,5) and earlier had one in Asia (1 Cor
16,19) (35). Although the episode cannot be used to determine Paul’s
view of the couple, Luke willingly portrays Priscilla (along with
Aquila) providing instruction about “the way†to Apollos in Acts
18,26. Both Luke and Paul mention Priscilla first in two texts (Acts
18,26, Rom 16,3). One also cannot assume the specific nature of their
marriage. Margaret Y. MacDonald, for example, in a discussion of
women as missionary partners in the Pauline churches, argues that it is
possible that even those who understood themselves as “husband and
wife†had “given up sex for the sake of the gospel†(36).
Andronicus and Junia (Rom 16,7; well known among the apostles)
were also possibly couples active in the mission. Paul similarly
mentions several pairs of women. Tryphaena and Tryphosa have
403. C.K. BARRETT, The First Epistle to the Corinthians (BNTC 7; Peabody, MA
1993) 203. KREMER, Der Erste Brief, 185.
(33) J. MURPHY – O’CONNOR, “The First Letter to the Corinthiansâ€, NJBC
798-815, esp. 806 with reference to BAUER, “Uxoresâ€, 99-100.
(34) See M. HENGEL, Der unterschätzte Petrus. Zwei Studien (Tübingen 2006)
209, n. 441, for the names given Peter’s wife and children in Syriac writers. The
name WEISS (Der erste Korintherbrief, 234) mentions (Concordia) ultimately
depends on a forged volume, but here is not the place for such an investigation.
(35) Possibly Ephesus as in 1 Cor 16,8 (and Acts 18,26).
(36) MACDONALD, “Was Celsus Right?â€, 157-184, esp. 163 (with reference to
1 Cor 7,5.36-38).