John Granger Cook, «1 Cor 9,5: The Women of the Apostles», Vol. 89 (2008) 352-368
The women of the apostles in 1 Cor 9,5 have posed a riddle in the history of interpretation. With few exceptions commentators over the last one hundred years have identified them as wives and dismissed the text in a few lines. Recent research on the role of women in early Christian mission has brought a fresh assessment, concluding that the women were missionary assistants to the apostles. This essay develops an extended argument to solidify the thesis using the history of interpretation, the nature of missionary partnerships in the Pauline epistles, semantics, some important parallels from the Greco-Roman world, and the nature of ancient households.
1 Cor 9,5: The Women of the Apostles 365
that of the late second century in Alexandria. Clement’s picture also
reflects Vitruvius’ distinction between the structure of Greek and
Roman houses (62). The situation may not be so clear. Vitruvius wrote in
I B.C.E., so the distinction, at least for aristocratic Greeks who could
afford such large homes, might be of some relevance for Paul’s
time(63). Cornelius Nepos (also of I B.C.E.) writes that
No Roman would hesitate to take his wife to a dinner party, or to allow
the mother of his family to occupy the first rooms in his house and to
walk about in public. The custom in Greece is completely different; a
woman cannot appear at a party unless it is among her relatives; she
can only sit in the interior of the house, which is called the women’s
quarters (gynaeconitis); this no male can enter unless he is a close
relation (64).
The wide-ranging use of gynaeconitis (women’s quarters) in Greek
literature of all periods is another argument against limiting Clement’s
vision to “second century Alexandria†(65). Philo uses it of Gaius’
survey of homes in Rome (66). Plutarch places Caesar’s wife in the
women’s quarters (67). In that text a scandal occurred when a young
man was found there with bad intentions.
(62) OSIEK – BALCH, Families in the New Testament World, 170, 6-10, 27-34
with reference to Vitruvius, De arch. 6.7.1-5 and Clement, Str. 3.6.52.
MACDONALD, “Was Celsus Right?â€, 168) refers to the marriages in Clement
(3.6.53.3) as “spiritual†and points out that Clement’s view that women only
ministered to other women was an acceptable division of labor for the end of the
second century (cp. ConstAp 3.16.1-2 [SC 329; 154,1-156,13 METZGER] for a
similar ministry of deaconesses).
(63) R. ALSTON, The City in Roman and Byzantine Egypt (London – New York
2002) 82, however, includes four plans of Greek houses (from various periods),
and none of them conforms to Vitruvius’ idealized picture, nor does the plan of the
house from Kellis illustrated in Ibid., 106. He notes that “there was no ‘standard
Greek house plan’†(Ibid., 81).
(64) Cornelius Nepos, Vitae praef. 6. quem enim Romanorum pudet uxorem
ducere in conuiuium? aut cuius non mater familias primum locum tenet aedium
atque in celebritate uersatur? quod multo fit aliter in Graecia. nam neque in
conuiuium adhibetur nisi propinquorum, neque sedet nisi in interiore parte
aedium, quae gynaeconitis appellatur, quo nemo accedit nisi propinqua
cognatione coniunctus. Trans. of LEFKOWITZ – FANT, Women’s Life, § 209.
(65) 247 uses of the gunaikwni'ti" in the TLG. It also appears in inscriptions
from Delos (e.g. IG XI/2 § 204.32 [268 B.C.E.], a lease of the women’s quarters
of a house owned by a temple). Another synonym is hJ gunaikeiva (gynaceum in
Latin).
(66) Philo, Leg. 358.
(67) Plutarch, Caes. 9.3.