John Granger Cook, «1 Cor 9,5: The Women of the Apostles», Vol. 89 (2008) 352-368
The women of the apostles in 1 Cor 9,5 have posed a riddle in the history of interpretation. With few exceptions commentators over the last one hundred years have identified them as wives and dismissed the text in a few lines. Recent research on the role of women in early Christian mission has brought a fresh assessment, concluding that the women were missionary assistants to the apostles. This essay develops an extended argument to solidify the thesis using the history of interpretation, the nature of missionary partnerships in the Pauline epistles, semantics, some important parallels from the Greco-Roman world, and the nature of ancient households.
1 Cor 9,5: The Women of the Apostles 355
Günther Zuntz chooses “women†as the correct reading because of
its geographical dispersion before the main text types emerged: “It is
original, the crude expression suits Paul’s polemical fervour and was
bound to provoke the various softening substitutes which the other
witnesses transmit†(20). Clearly some of the old Latin witnesses such as
Tertullian indicate that there were old variations. Contra Zuntz, when
one carefully analyzes the interpretation of the text in individuals such
as Aphrahaat it is not at all clear that “women†was a “crude
expression†(21). Aphrahaat (IV C.E.), the ascetic Persian sage, in a
discussion of monks, refers to the celibate example of John the Baptist
and Elijah. He then mentions the Apostle (Paul) and Barnabas and
quotes 1 Cor 9,5 with the reading “women†instead of “sister womanâ€.
He adds a phrase that apparently ascribes the view to Paul that “it was
not righteous†(to take women around) (22). The reading “womenâ€
morphed easily into the interpretation “servant women†(in the singular
serviens matrona). “Sister woman†seems a far more problematic text
for the interpreter, and most likely was Paul’s expression.
III. The Women as Assistants in Mission
Clement provided a very specific function for the women whom
the apostles took with them. In a passage against those who reject
marriage, Clement states that Peter was married and that he (along with
the Philip of Acts — an apostle also in Clement’s view) “made
childrenâ€. After quoting 1 Cor 9,5, he notes of the other apostles that
they devoted themselves without distraction to the proclamation and
led around their women (ta;" gunai'ka") not as wives (gametav") but as
sisters to be fellow ministers (sundiakovnou") to household managing
women (ta;" oikourou" gunaika"). Through these women the teaching
j ; '
of the Lord was introduced into the women’s quarters (th;n
gunaikwni'tin) without slander (23). That he understands the women to
(20) ZUNTZ, The Text, 138. BAUER, “Uxoresâ€, 95 agrees with the reading.
(21) For a similar judgment cf J. KREMER, Der Erste Brief an die Korinther
(RNT; Regensburg 1997) 185.
(22) Aphrahaat, Dem. 6.5 (PO I/1; 264,22–265,2 PARISOT).
(23) Clem. Alex., Str. 3.6.52.5-53.3 (GCS Clemens Alexandrinus II; 220,15-
24 STÄHLIN – FRÜCHTEL). Cp. oijkourouv" in 4.20.128.1 (304,30 ST./FR.) and the
trans. in G. BRAY (1-2 Corinthians [Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture
7; Downers Grove 1999] 80): “wives … as Christian sisters rather than as
spouses†(from FC 85, 289).