Thomas R. Hatina, «Who Will See "The Kingdom of God Coming with Power" in Mark 9,1 — Protagonists or Antagonists?», Vol. 86 (2005) 20-34
In conventional readings of Mark 9,1, the meaning of the
"kingdom of God coming with power" determines the identity of the bystanders who
will supposedly experience ("see") it. Since the prediction of the kingdom is
usually regarded as a blessing, it is assumed that the bystanders are
protagonists. In contrast to this conventional approach, the reading proposed in
this essay begins with the group(s) which will experience ("see") "the kingdom
of God coming with power", first in 9,1 and then in 13,26 and 14,62. When prior
attention is given to these groups in the context of the narrative, Jesus’
prediction in Mark 9,1 emerges not as a blessing promised to the protagonists,
but as a threat of judgment aimed at antagonists.
26 Thomas R. Hatina
simply another way of saying “during the lifetime of the present
generationâ€.
In the end, the following synonymous parallelism emerges:
Mark 8,38 Mark 9,1
(a) Whoever [i.e. from among the (a1) there are some standing here [i.e
“crowd with his disciplesâ€] is from among the “crowd with his
ashamed of me disciplesâ€]
(b1) who [these] will not taste death
(b) [these] in this… generation
(c1) until they see that the kingdom
(c) when the son of man comes in
of God has come with power.
his Father’s glory
In the broader context, 9,1 is best read as a generalization
developed out of the story of Peter’s confession in 8,27-33 (18). Peter’s
strong disapproval of Jesus’ perceived fate (8,32) provides a
springboard for the subsequent warnings. While this section (8,27–9,1)
is certainly concerned with the importance of loyalty for all who
follow Jesus, as has often been argued since Vincent Taylor’s
treatment (19), it does not appear to be the dominant theme, but rather
an inevitability. Since Jesus gives much more attention to his own
rejection and the fate of those who do not follow him, the dominant
theme is disloyalty.
——————
God is as certain as the immortality of the heroic immortals. Chilton admits that
his reading does not literally press the emphatic negation of e{w" a[n. He tries to
resolve this problem by looking at it in light of Semitic grammar. While the
construction is used in Hebrew and Aramaic, it is still perplexing why Mark, who
was presumably familiar with Aramaic, chose e{w" a[n if he understood “those who
will not taste death†as a reference to people who will never die. To “taste deathâ€
certainly refers to death, as it does in early Jewish literature, but it must be
understood in light of the temporal particle e{w" which clearly indicates “a time up
to which†or “untilâ€. See B.D. CHILTON, God in Strength. Jesus’ Announcement
of the Kingdom (The Biblical Seminar; Sheffield 1987) 268-272; ID., A Feast
of Meanings. Eucharistic Theologies from Jesus through Johannine Circles
(NovTSup 72; Leiden 1994) 169-171. Another potential difficulty is the
uncertainty of Moses experiencing death prior to his ascension. See the discussion
in D.L. BOCK, Blasphemy and Exaltation in Judaism and the Final Examination
of Jesus. A Philological-Historical Study of the Key Jewish Themes Impacting
Mark 14:61-64 (WUNT 2/106; Tübingen 1998) 133-145.
(18) See E. HAENCHEN, “Die Komposition vom Mk 8,27-9,1 und par.â€, NovT
6 (1963) 81-109; D.E. NINEHAM, Saint Mark (London 1969) 223-228.
(19) V. TALYOR, The Gospel According St. Mark (London 1952) 380.