124 Josep Rius-Camps and Jenny Read-Heimerdinger forces with them against Paul; D05 has the Jews urging the crowds on, probably with the idea that they used scare tactics (L-S-J, 1, ἐπισείω). ἔσυρον B P74 ) A C H P 049. 056. 33. 81 pm || ἔσυραν D E L 614. 945. 1739 pm. B03 reads the imperfect of σύρω, D05 the aorist (cf. 17.6 where the sa- me vl is found). The imperfect is probably to be interpreted as inceptive: ‘they started dragging…’. νομίζοντεϛ αὐτὸν τεθνηκέναι B P45.74 ) rell | νομίσαντεϛ αὐ. τεθνηκέναι C 323. 927. 945. 1270. 1739. 1891. 2344 | νομίσαντεϛ αὐ. τεθνᾶναι E H L P 049. 056 M || νομίζοντεϛ τεθνᾶναι αὐ. D, existimantes mortuum esse eum d. Both B03 and D05 read the present participle of νομίζω. Both the long and the short forms of the perfect active infinitive are attested outside the New Testament (for examples, see B-A-G; L-J-S, θνῄσκω). 14.20 κυκλωσάντων δὲ τῶν μαθητῶν αὐτόν B P74 ) A C DB (– αὐτόν Ψ) 33vid. 81. 614. 927. 1175. 1611. 1646. 1837. 2147. 2344. 2412 | κυ. δὲ αὐτὸν τ. μαθ. (+ αὐτοῦ E) H L P 049. 056. 1739 M || κυκλώσαντεϛ δὲ τῶν μαθητῶν τ. μαθ. (! οἱ μαθηταί, cf. d vgF; Ephr) αὐτοῦ D* (+ αὐτόν P45vid, circumeuntes enim discipuli eius d). The nominative participle read by D05 must be presumed to be an error for the genitive, since there is no nominative subject. The genitive pronoun αὐτοῦ is, however, possible, leaving the object of the participle (Paul, expressed by αὐτόν in B03) implicit. Λύστραν D d || om. B P74 ) rell. The name of the city is unnecessary from the point of view of clarity, but it contributes to the coherence of the narrative from the structural point of view. τῇ (ἐπαύριον) B P45.74 ) Ds.m. rell || τήν D*. D* reads the accusative article rectified by a later corrector. This is the only example in the New Testament of ἐπαύριον with the accusative, so it would seem to be an error, although there are other instances of the accusative expressing a point of time rather than duration (e.g. Acts 20.16; cf. Robertson, Grammar, pp. 470–71).