Stanley E. Porter - Matthew Brook O'Donnel, «Conjunctions, Clines and Levels of Discourse.», Vol. 20 (2007) 3-14
Conjunctions have proved to be a recurring problem for Greek analysis. They are usually treated on the same level of analysis, as if they presented a single set of discrete choices. However, the use of conjunctions in Greek provides two horizontal clines of conjunctive meaning–continuity-discontinuity and logical-semantic significance–and are selected according to a vertical cline of discourse. This paper explores a basic framework for analysis of conjunctions in the light of these axes.
11
Conjunctions, Clines and Levels of Discourse
junctive semantic phenomenon24. She notes the contribution especially
of Winer and more recently of Blomqvist on this issue25. Both argue,
though for different reasons, that there is no such thing as adversative
καί. Black’s conclusion is a reasonable one. She differentiates between the
function of the conjunction–to provide continuity between elements–and
the contribution of context, even if the semantic content of the elements
may be contrastive. The adversative sense comes from the elements, not
the conjunction.
A number of these conjunctions may also be paired with another con-
junction as an extension of the procedural sense of the conjunction.
c. The Cline of Logical-Semantic Significance
The third and final cline of conjunction usage is the cline of logical-
semantic significance. Whereas the conjunctions noted in the horizontal
cline above are procedurally concerned with continuity–discontinuity,
this horizontal cline is concerned with the logical-semantic relations. This
cline, rather than being organized according to frequency of distribution
of the conjunction, is organized by logical-semantic criteria. The order-
ing of semantic relations is as follows: comparative–local–temporal–con-
ditional–inferential/causal–purpose/result. Those conjunctions that indi-
cate the greatest similarity, proximity and coordination of elements are
placed on the left and those that indicate the most dissimilarity, distance
and subordination of elements are placed on the right, along with their
negative equivalents. The conjunctions used in the New Testament that
fall within these categories are as follows:
Comparαtive (ὡς, ὥσπεÏ, καθώς, καθό, καθά, καθάπεÏ, οὕτως,
ὠσαÏτως, ὡσεί)
Local (ὅπου, ὅθεν, οὗ)
Temporal (ὅτε, ὅταν, ἕως, Ï€Ïίν, ἄχÏι, μÎχÏι, οὔπω, οá½Î´Îποτε,
οá½ÎºÎτι)
Conditional (εἰ, á¼Î¬Î½, εἴτε)
Inferential/causal (ὅτι, διότι, καθότι, ἄÏα, á¼Ï€ÎµÎ¯, á¼Ï€ÎµÎ¹Î´Î®Ï€ÎµÏ, á¼Ï€ÎµÎ¯Î´Î·)
Purpose/result (ἵνα, ὅπως, ὥστε, μήπω, μήποτε)
The cline of principal conjunctions (expanded, derived or compounded
forms are not necessarily included) appears as follows:
Black, Sentence Conjunctions, 137-40.
24
G.B. Winer, A Treatise on the Grammar of New Testament Greek (trans. W.F. Moulton;
25
Edinburgh 31881) 543-45; J. Blomqvist, Das sogennante KAI Adversativum: Zur Semantik
einer griechischen Partikel (Studia Graeca Upsaliensia 13; Uppsala 1979) esp. 25.