C. John Collins, «Noah, Deucalion, and the New Testament», Vol. 93 (2012) 403-426
Jewish authors in the second Temple period, as well as early Christian authors after the New Testament, made apologetically-motivated connections between the biblical story of Noah and Gentile stories of the flood, including Greek stories involving deucalion — most notably Plato’s version. Analysis of the New Testament letters attributed to Peter indicates that these also allude to the Gentile flood stories, likely in order to enhance their readers’ sense of the reality of the biblical events.
05_Biblica_1_H_Collins_Layout 1 05/11/12 12:19 Pagina 412
412 C. JOHN COLLINS
in his mention of a dove returning to Noah “smeared with mudâ€
, echoing, not the Bible, but Berossus’ very wording:
the birds returned “having their feet smeared with mudâ€
Josephus has a number of interesting connections with Plato’s
account in the Laws and Timaeus as well, some of which Feldman
has already pointed out. For example, Josephus tells us that Adam
“predicted that there would be an extermination of the universe, at
one time by a violent fire and at another time by a force with an
abundance of water†(Antiq. 1,70), which Feldman finds evocative
of Plato’s Timaeus, 22c, regarding the “many and divers destruc-
tions of mankind, of which the greatest are by fire and waterâ€. Of
course, Josephus connects these destructions to human sin, which
makes him closer to Ovid (not to mention the Mesopotamians) than
to Plato. Further, Josephus (Antiq. 1,109) has people descending
from the mountain regions to the plains ( ) after the
flood and persuading others who are fearful to leave the highlands
, a detail that the Bible lacks but that ap-
pears in Plato’s flood story (Laws, 678b), which speaks of those
who feared going down “from the highlands to the plains†(
Another point of terminology comes from
Josephus’ use of the term for the “saving†of Noah and
his family (e.g., Antiq. 1,78.89; Against Apion, 1,130), a word ab-
sent from Genesis LXX and present in Plato (677b) 21. We may add
to Feldman’s list another term, namely for God’s activ-
ity of “destroying†people, again a term absent from Genesis (which
) but present in Plato (e.g., Laws,
uses the cognate
677c) as well as in Pseudo-Apollodorus (see above). Feldman’s ex-
planation for these parallels, both with the Mesopotamian stories
and with the Greek ones, seems promising: Josephus wrote with
apologetic intent, especially to assure his audience that the biblical
story was about real events.
The Sibylline Oracles, Book 1, recounts the early chapters of
Genesis. It is a Jewish production (with probable Christian redac-
tion) in the garb of Graeco-Roman prophecies. The Jewish substrate
It is at least conceivable that Josephus has used this word under the in-
21
fluence of Wisdom 14:5, but in view of the other factors here, it seems most
likely that Josephus derived his wording from Plato himself.