C. John Collins, «Noah, Deucalion, and the New Testament», Vol. 93 (2012) 403-426
Jewish authors in the second Temple period, as well as early Christian authors after the New Testament, made apologetically-motivated connections between the biblical story of Noah and Gentile stories of the flood, including Greek stories involving deucalion — most notably Plato’s version. Analysis of the New Testament letters attributed to Peter indicates that these also allude to the Gentile flood stories, likely in order to enhance their readers’ sense of the reality of the biblical events.
05_Biblica_1_H_Collins_Layout 1 05/11/12 12:19 Pagina 408
408 C. JOHN COLLINs
There are indications, most clearly in eusebius’ Preparation of the
Gospel, 10.9, 10, and augustine, City of God 21.8 (preserving material
from the 1st century B.C.e. roman historian Varro), that the Greeks
had tales of an earlier flood associated with a king, Ogygos; but not
much is known of this person, and Jewish and Christian writers place
most of their attention on the better-known deucalion (who, as we
can see, was also likened to the hero of the Mesopotamian story).
There are other tales that associate great floods with various characters
(such as dardanus), but these floods are more clearly of limited sig-
nificance and do not figure in the process of drawing parallels 12.
II. references to non-biblical flood stories
in second Temple Jewish sources
since I am looking for ways in which second Temple Jewish au-
thors thought about non-biblical flood stories in the period before
and roughly contemporary with the New Testament, I can safely
leave out of my discussion the later rabbinic sources in Hebrew and
aramaic, even though they may indeed contain materials from the
time we are considering 13. Besides, being in Hebrew and aramaic,
these sources will not help us in searching for Greek terms. For the
most part, the specifically sectarian texts from Qumran do not have
much bearing on our discussion either.
The Hebrew Bible itself does not have many explicit references
to the Noah story; the most straightforward are Isaiah 54,9 and
ezekiel 14,14.20 14. Isaiah 54,9 uses God’s promise after the great
flood as an image for God’s enduring commitment to preserve zion.
ezekiel 14,14.20 mentions Noah as a member of a trio of exemplary
men (Noah, daniel/dan’el, and Job) whose righteousness would not
12
e.g., from the first century B.C.e.: dionysius of Halicarnassus, 1.61.2
Cf. M. Hadas, Hellenistic Culture. Fusion and diffusion (Morningside
(in arcadia); diodorus siculus, 5.47.3 (at the island of samothrace).
13
Heights, Ny 1959) 79-82, who finds traces of Judaism’s contact with Helle-
nism more in the indirect realm of loan words and modes of argumentation.
14
some would add Isa 24,18 (“windows of heaven openedâ€, cf. Gen 7,11;
typological interpretation of Noah’s floodâ€, Criswell Theological Review 5
8,2) to this list: e.g., d. sTreeTT, “as it was in the days of Noah: The prophets’
(2007) 33-51. If this is correct, it is an image for the unavoidable devastation
that will fall.