Juan Manuel Granados Rojas, «Ephesians 4,12. A Revised Reading», Vol. 92 (2011) 81-96
This paper proposes a new interpretation of Eph 4,12 based on a rhetorical analysis of the thought in the section (4,7-16). This structural approach has favored the interpretative clues provided by the text itself and has clarified the meaning of a NT hapax legomenon (katartismo/v). The prepositional sequence in Eph 4,12 expresses agreement (pro/v + accusative), purpose (eiv) and result (eiv), in this order. Such an interpretation, in accordance with the train of thought of the whole section, stresses a relationship of agreement between Christ’s gift and the ministry of the Word for building up his body.
84 JUAN MANUEL GRANADOS ROJAS
least three possibilities attested by ancient writers 12 : “resetting broken
bones †13, “restoration†14 and “equipping†15. Many authors have attempted
to determine its meaning by looking at the NT usage of the related verb
katartızw ; however, it might be more correct to find the sense of katar-
Â¥
tismon by studying carefully its use in the current context.
Â¥
The phrase prov ton katartismon cannot be isolated from the
ù ù ¥
sequence of the three prepositional phrases. In order to determine the use of
the first phrase in its context, it is necessary to examine the main verb of the
sequence, as well as the purpose and meaning of the change of prepositions.
This last issue has been long debated; so it shall be the first discussed.
1. The overlap of prov and eıv and the use of prov + accusative
¥ ß ¥
The preposition prov can be used with either the genitive, dative or
Â¥
accusative case. However in NT Greek it is almost always used with the
accusative 16. Each grammar of NT Greek explains the preposition in dif-
ferent ways 17 ; but its main senses are basically the same: spatial, temporal
and relational. The spatial sense, which is widespread throughout the NT,
indicates the place or the direction towards which the verbal action takes
place 18. The temporal sense, which is less attested in NT, shows the duration
– ‘to make adequate, to furnish completely, to cause to be fully qualified, ade-
quacy’ â€. J.P. LOUW – E.A. NIDA, Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testa-
ment Based on Semantic Domains (New York 21989) 680.
See H.G. LIDELL – R. SCOTT – H.S. JONES – R. MCKENZIE, Greek
12
English Lexicon (Oxford 91996) 910.
Apollonius, Hippocratis de articulis commentarius, 11.21; 22.27; see
13
also 29.37 as “healing a limbâ€. See Pseudo-Galenus, Definitiones medicae,
19.461.7.
Symmachus’ version of Isa 38,12.
14
Preparation and furnishing in PTebt 33:12; PRyl 127.8.
15
With genitive only in Acts 27,34; with dative only six times (always
16
local sense): Mark 5,11; Luke 19,37; John 18,16; 20,11.12; Rev 1,13. See BDF
240.
See F. BLASS – A. DEBRUNNER – W. FUNK, A Greek Grammar of the
17
New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature (Cambridge 1961) 239.8;
H.W. SMYTH, Greek Grammar Revised by G.M. MESSING) (Cambridge,
MA 1984) 1965; M. ZERWICK, Graecitas biblica Novi Testamenti (SPIB;
Roma 51966) 97-98; J.H. MOULTON, A Grammar of New Testament Greek, III
(Edinburg 31908-1963) § 4; BAGD, 873-875; LIDDELL-SCOTT, 1496-1499.
M.J. HARRIS, “Prepositions and Theology in the Greek New Testamentâ€, The
New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology (ed. C. BROWN)
(Grand Rapids, MI 1975) 1171-1215.
Usually after verbs of going, sending, motion in general, leading, saying
18
or speaking, asking and praying. BAGD, 874.