John Kilgallen, «Acts 28,28 — Why?», Vol. 90 (2009) 176-187
The Isaian citation, used by Paul to describe his encounter with certain Jews in Rome, does not stand alone: it leads to a conclusion, a conclusion which is an imperative and an assurance. What is commanded is a knowledge of the plan of
God already in motion, a plan to offer salvation to Jews and Gentiles. As information for Jews of Rome, this final word of Paul is best understood as a motive for repentance; knowledge of the divine plan of God, which will succeed (28b), serves as an encouragement to Roman Jews to «turn and be healed by Me».
- «Luke 20,13 and i1swj» 2008 263-264
- «Luke wrote to Rome – a Suggestion» 2007 251-255
- «What Does It Mean to Say That There Are Additions in Luke 7,36-50?» 2005 529-535
- «Hostility to Paul in Pisidian Antioch (Acts 13,45) — Why?» 2003 1-15
- «Martha and Mary: Why at Luke 10,38-42?» 2003 554-561
- «‘With many other words’ (Acts 2,40): Theological Assumptions in Peter’s Pentecost Speech» 2002 71-87
- «The Obligation to Heal (Luke 13,10-17)» 2001 402-409
- «`The Apostles Whom He Chose because of the Holy Spirit'
A Suggestion Regarding Acts 1,2» 2000 414-417
- «The Strivings of the Flesh
(Galatians 5,17)» 1999 113-114
- «Jesus First Trial: Messiah and Son of God (Luke 22,66-71)» 1999 401-414
- «The Importance of the Redactor in Luke 18,9-14» 1998 69-75
- «Was Jesus Right to Eat with Sinners and Tax Collectors?» 2012 590-600
180 John Kilgallen
28,28 follows the usual Lucan practice that speaks only of salvation to
Jews and Gentiles.
2. Acts 28,28 in regard to Acts 13,46 and 18,6
Often in regard to the movement “first to the Jew, then to the
Gentileâ€, Acts 28,28 is placed as the third of a triad of texts; the first
two texts are Acts 13,46 (16) and 18,6. But these two texts differ from
Acts 28,28, precisely because of implications from the aorist tense
apestalh. The Jews of Acts 28 are to learn a past fact, not a fact which
j v
merits the present tense (17) or future action. Too, these two texts speak
directly of Paul’s personally turning from Jew to Gentile; Acts 28,28
does not describe a personal decision of Paul, but has to do with
information that it is necessary for these Jews to know. Finally,
whereas in Acts 28,28 there is the assurance that the Gentiles ‘will
listen’ (18), there is no such concern with the stories of Acts 13 and
18 (19). Indeed, these observations regarding Acts 13,46 and 18,6
underline how different Acts 28,28 is from them, and thereby suggest
a peculiar meaning for this last verse (20).
refer, by virtue of Lucan creativity, to the Gentiles, but such a reference is not
clear, nor is it clear that Jesus thought in the manner of the banquet host of the
parable (14,15-24).
(16) At Acts 13,47, Paul cites Isaia 49,6: “I will make you a light to the
nations, that my salvation may reach to the ends of the earthâ€. Note that the point
of the quotation is not to emphasize “first to the Jew, then to the Gentileâ€, but only
movement to the end of the earth. The essence of the mission is to fulfil the saving
will of God; that it happens “first to the Jew, then to the Gentile†is secondary.
(17) Misguided is the opinion: “But the book of Acts is at an end, and so is the
cycle [alternating pattern of rejection and mission]â€, J. SANDERS, The Jews in
Luke-Acts (SCM; London 1987) 299.
(18) In the usual Lucan sense of ‘listen favorably’ or ‘will obey’ (Lk 5,1.15;
8,8.21; 9,35; 10,16; 11,28; 14,35; 15,1; 21,38; prob. 23,8; Acts 4,19; prob. 8,6;
9,21; 13,7.4.48; 15,7; 18,8.26; 21,20).
(19) Instructive is the presentation of Peter in Acts, in the sense that nowhere
is rejection of his preaching by Jews the sign that he is now to turn to the Gentiles.
Even when Peter, in paradigm fashion, goes to, preaches to and baptizes
Cornelius, he is the passive, even unwilling instrument of God of the offer of
salvation to the Gentiles. It is in the Pauline experiences, beginning with Chapter
13, that one first finds narrative expression of the principle, “To the Gentiles,
because Jews have refused to believeâ€.
(20) “The importance (of the mission at Antioch) is underscored by the similar
pattern of events found in later scenes (cf. … 28:23-28)â€, R. TANNEHILL, The
Narrative Unity of Luke-Acts (Minneapolis, MN 1990) II, 175.