Peter Dubovský, «Assyrian downfall through Isaiah’s eyes (2 Kings 15–23): the historiography of representation», Vol. 89 (2008) 1-16
In this article I compared Assyrian expansion as presented in the Bible with that presented in the Assyrian sources. Then I pointed out the problems of the historical events presented in the Bible. Combining these problems with the results of source-criticism I argued that the biblical 'distortion' of the historical events was intentional. The writers probably did it to offer their interpretation of the downfall of Assyria. This presentation and organization of the events can be explained in terms of the historiography of representation. By applying this concept it is possible to explain several textual and historical problems of these chapters.
4 Peter Dubovsk´
y
by Sargon II against the Levant (ARAB II.30) is not mentioned in 2
Kgs (7).
The last Assyrian campaign, described in 2 Kgs 18–20, can be
identified with Sennacherib’s invasion in 701 B.C. The written sources
and archaeological excavations confirm the destruction of several
Judean cities and the Assyrians admit that Jerusalem was not captured
(ARAB II.239-240, 309-312) (8). However, the result of the campaign
was satisfactory enough for Sennacherib to turn his attention towards
the east. He captured Babylon and conquered part of Elam. These
grandiose victories help the Assyrians to get a steadfast foothold in the
east (ARAB II.241-254).
The campaigns of Sennacherib’s successor Esarhaddon are not
mentioned in the Bible. He captured the city of Arzani “on the brook of
Egypt†in 679 B.C., organized a punitive campaign to quell the
upheaval led by the king of Sidon in 675 B.C. (ARAB II.511-512, 527),
and settle the problems with the Arabs (ARAB II.518). His expansion
reached its climax when he conquered Egypt in 671 B.C. marching
through Philistia (ARAB II.580-581). Ashurbanipal continued the
expansionist policy of his father Esarhaddon, however, his campaigns
are not mentioned in the Bible either. He managed to eliminate the last
nests of Egyptian resistance and thus Assyrian control extended from
Elam to Egypt (ARAB II.875) (9). During this period Judah was for
most of the time a loyal vassal paying tribute and complying with the
Assyrian demands (10). Archaeological excavations have demonstrated
Assyrian presence in Israel in the form of typical Assyrian buildings,
fortresses, pottery and other artifacts that suggest strong Assyrian
control over Judah (11). The Assyrian empire started declining at the end
(7) J.J.M. ROBERTS, “Egypt, Assyria, Isaiah, and the Ashdod Affair: An
Alternative Proposalâ€, Jerusalem in Bible and Archaeology. The First Temple
Period (ed. A.E. KILLEBREW) (Atlanta, GA 2003) 265-283.
(8) L.L. GRABBE, “Like a Bird in a Cageâ€. The Invasion of Sennacherib in 701
B.C.E. (London – New York 2003) 2-43.
(9) Assyrian control over Egypt did not last too long. In 653 B.C. the
Assyrians had already been expelled from Egypt.
(10) According to 2 Chr 33,10-13 Manasseh was deported by the captains of
the Assyrian army to Babylon; see S. JAPHET, I & II Chronicles. A Commentary
(London 1993) 1000-1004.
(11) For a short summary see E. STERN – A. MAZAR, Archaeology of the Land
of the Bible. The Assyrian, Babylonian, and Persian Periods, 732-332 BCE (New
York 2001) II, 14-57.