Peter Dubovský, «Assyrian downfall through Isaiah’s eyes (2 Kings 15–23): the historiography of representation», Vol. 89 (2008) 1-16
In this article I compared Assyrian expansion as presented in the Bible with that presented in the Assyrian sources. Then I pointed out the problems of the historical events presented in the Bible. Combining these problems with the results of source-criticism I argued that the biblical 'distortion' of the historical events was intentional. The writers probably did it to offer their interpretation of the downfall of Assyria. This presentation and organization of the events can be explained in terms of the historiography of representation. By applying this concept it is possible to explain several textual and historical problems of these chapters.
Assyrian downfall through Isaiah’s eyes (2 Kings 15–23) 3
The Neo-Assyrian expansion towards the west started one century
earlier than the Bible claims. The first real encounter between Assyria
and Israel, not mentioned in the Bible, took place during the reign of
Shalmaneser III (ARAB I.610-611). The Israelite troops led by Achab
took part in the battle of Qarqar (853 B.C.). Then we learn from the
Assyrian sources that Achab’s successor Jehu paid tribute to
Shalmaneser III in 841 B.C. (ARAB I.672). The campaigns of Adad-
nirari III’s reign are not mentioned in the Bible at all (ARAB I.739-
740) (3).
The second major encounter with the Assyrians described in 2 Kgs
15,19-21 as the campaign of Pul can be identified with Phase I of
Tiglath-pileser III’s campaigns against Syria (743-738 B.C.). This
series of campaigns resulted in establishing Neo-Assyrian provinces in
northern Syria. The rest of the local kings recognized Assyrian
sovereignty by paying tribute, Israel included (ARAB I.769-771) (4).
A later encounter with the Assyrians described in 2 Kgs 15,29 and
16,7-10 corresponds to three campaigns of Tiglath-pileser III
conducted against the Levant in 734-732 B.C. These campaigns
resulted in turning Damascus into a new Assyrian province and in the
confirmation of the pro-Assyrian king Hoshea on the throne in
Samaria. Judah by paying tribute managed to maintain a certain level
of independence (ARAB I.776-779, 815-819) (5).
The biblical description of the end of the Northern kingdom most
likely telescopes two Assyrian campaigns into one narrative.
According to the Assyrian sources the first campaign was led by
Shalmaneser V (Babylonian Chronicle I i:28) and the second was led
by Sargon II (ARAB II.4-5, 17, 55, 80, 92, 99, 133-135). These
campaigns marked the end of the Israelite kingdom and Samaria
became the capital of a new Assyrian province, SËmer^na. Judah once
again managed to mantain its independence (6). A further campaign led
(3) R.E. TAPPY, The Archaeology of Israelite Samaria (HSS 50; Atlanta, GA.
1992) II, 506-611.
(4) I. EPHAL, “The Assyrian Domination of Palestineâ€, WHJP (1979) 276-289;
H. TADMOR, The Inscriptions of Tiglath-Pileser III, King of Assyria. Critical
Edition, with Introduction, Translations and Commentary (Jerusalem 1994) 276.
(5) P. DUBOVSK´ , “Tiglath-Pileser III’s Campaigns in 734-732 B.C.:
Y
Historical Background of Isa 7, 2 Kgs 15-16 and 2 Chr 27-28â€, Bib 87 (2006) 153-
170.
(6) B. BECKING, The Fall of Samaria. An Historical and Archaeological
Summary (Leiden 1992) 47-60.